My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/26/1982
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 01/26/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:27:52 PM
Creation date
5/21/2004 11:58:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/26/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rI <br /> <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I' <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4. Environmental Protection (Jim Baker) <br /> <br />In a survey of local government officials, the County found that <br />its assistance to communities was desired in several planning <br />areas. Those pertinent to environmental management are: <br />"Drainage planning and controls," and "Wetlands preservation." <br /> <br />On these and other matters, however, the implied position of the <br />County is to provide assistance only when an issue includes one <br />or more communities. The Plan notes that most conTnunities of the- <br />County have addressed wetlands in their comprehensive plans; and <br />all but two communities in which wetlands are important, have <br />decided to regulate wetland protection. <br /> <br />Long-term protection of valuable agricultural lands in the County <br />is not seen as a widespread desire in most communities, as large <br />scale comercial agricultural operations are uncommon. 0nly a <br />few comunities are making special efforts in this area. <br /> <br />Nine of the County's communities already have or will be <br />preparing stormwater drainage plans. <br /> <br />The County will review local land use plans and ordinances <br />relating to protection of natural resources. But, with the <br />exception~ noted above, will leave principal implementation <br />responsibilities to communities. <br /> <br />Against this background, Plan policies encourage continued <br />agriculture usage in both general rural use areas, and general <br />urban use areas where urban development is not planned. Farmland <br />preservation mechanisms will be encouraged where appropriate. <br /> <br />Policies for general urban use areas encourage sensitivity of <br />development to: wetlands, steep slopes, unstable soils, mature <br />trees, floodplains, shoreland and designated critical areas and <br />wild and scenic rivers. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br /> <br />General rural use area policies encourage regulations to protect <br />those same environmental features; and in addition encourage <br />regulations to protect gravel deposits for future use. <br /> <br />Policies also state that environmental effects will be primary <br />considerations in siting waste disposal landfills. <br /> <br />Shoreland and floodplain management regulations and County <br />drainage authority will be the principal controls used for Plan <br />implementation. These controls are now in place. <br /> <br />Surface~ater management is also addressed. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5. Solid Waste (Paul Smith) <br /> <br />Anoka County's solid waste element in their Comprehensive Plan is <br />the same as the County's Solid Waste Master Plan required under <br />the Waste Management Act (WMA) which was approved by the Council <br />on September 24, 1981 as an interim plan. The sol'id waste <br />element begins by describing waste generation in the County and <br />disposal facilities that are currently being used. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.