Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />a major natural and economic resource and that a <br />major objective of any [and use strategy is the <br />preservation of this prime agricultural land. The <br />League endorses a policy of urban conservation <br />based on these precepts. There are several steps <br />that should be taken to: 1) strengthen the present <br />land use controls exercised by cities and coun- <br />ties; 2) provide a framework for orderly, planned <br />growth for cities through the Minnesota Munici- <br />pal Board; 3) discourage scattered development, <br />especially those developments located on agricul- <br />tural land, wetlands, or other land needing pro- <br />tection; and 4) provide the necessary policy direc- <br />tion concerning land-use decisions which clearly <br />have statewide or regional implications. To this <br />end, the League has developed several proposals <br />which address various aspects of the problem. <br /> <br /> Agricultural preservation. The state should <br />establish a policy encouraging the preservation of <br />prime agricultural land which discourages the <br />development of such land outside areas to be <br />served by a municipal community and encourages <br />regional agencies and local governments to adopt <br />agricultural preservation policies and ordinances. <br /> <br /> The state should bank and interpret useful data, <br />including relevant soil-type information, on prime <br />agricultural land that will assist local governments <br />in their preservation efforts. The League urges the <br />legislature to establish a committee representing <br />local government as well as other interested parties <br />to propose an agricultural preservation strategy <br />to the 1979 Legislature. <br /> <br /> Local and regional governments should be re- <br />quired to include an agricultural protection ele- <br />ment ip their comprehensive plans and zoning <br />ordinances. <br /> <br /> Interim or fringe area land. The Minnesota law <br />that provides preferential property assessments <br />for agricultural property (i.e., the Green Acres <br />Act) is principally aimed at transitional or fringe <br />area land. <br /> <br /> The law should be modified so that it provides <br />a positive tool for municipalities and counties in <br />influencing orderly development. Specifically, land <br />would qualify for Green Acres status only when <br />it qualifies under a local government's compre- <br />hensive plan or zoning ordinance, or is approved by <br />the local governing body. Also, adequate controls <br />should be provided to ensure an orderly transition <br />to urban uses, including city determination of <br />when the land no longer qualifies for tax abate- <br />ment a/~d/or assessment deferral. When the land <br /> <br />no longer qualifies for tax abatement, then land <br />should be assessed consistent with its planned <br />use; however, that portion of the Green Acres law <br />providing for payment of special assessments <br />should be modified to allow an extended pay-back <br />periods, at local option. When any qualifying land <br />is sold, the sale would automatically bring it back <br />to the local government for reconsideration of the <br />tax deferment and abatement status. Finally, <br />there should be no automatic "roll-back" or recap- <br />ture of the difference in tax revenues° Actual <br />roll-back provisions could be negotiated locally <br />or determined in local ordinances. <br /> <br />111-4. Solid and Hazardous Waste Management (A) <br /> <br /> The problem of solid and hazardous waste dis- <br />posal will be one of the major environmental <br />issues of the next decade. Legislation addressing <br />this problem enacted in 1980 responded to the <br />following concerns of the League, and this legis- <br />lation should not be amended to diminish the <br />emphasis on these concerns: <br /> <br />Planning for solid waste disposal. The <br />agency or agencies responsible for develop- <br />ing plans for solid waste disposal should <br />first identify the types of solid waste in- <br />volved and the sources of the solid waste. <br />The plan should give first priority to alter- <br />native use of solid wastes, including genera- <br />tion of energy and recycling. Determination <br />of the applicability of these alternative types <br />of disposal systems should be made prior to <br />the land-fill siting process° Site selection <br />standards and criteria should be developed <br />prior to the siting process and should be <br />subject to exhaustive public hearings and <br />Chapter 15 Administrative Procedures Act <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Planning for hazardous waste disposal. A <br />statewide plan for the disposal and regula- <br />tion of hazardous waste must be developed. <br />Hazardous waste must be defined and the <br />sources identified by type, volume, loca- <br />tion, and generator. Those responsible for <br />generation must be involved in solving the <br />disposal problem. Hazardous waste genera- <br />tors must be encouraged to modify produc- <br />tion processes to reuse or recover as much <br />waste as possible and to use less hazardous <br />raw materials in their process. Hazardous <br />waste generators must be required to handle <br />the wastes that are produced in such a way <br />that will allow these wastes to be identi- <br />fied, collected, and recycled or to be dis- <br /> <br />-11 ~ <br /> <br /> <br />