My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/12/1982
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1982
>
Agenda - Council - 01/12/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 12:27:29 PM
Creation date
5/21/2004 12:09:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/12/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />building security features that exceed those set <br />forth in the code. <br /> <br /> Cities should also have the option to make the <br />uniform fire code apply to structures existing on <br />the date of the adoption of the code, as well as <br />to new construction. <br /> <br />V-5. Handicapped Provisions of the State Building <br />Code (13) <br /> <br /> The League recommends that the handicapped <br />provisions of the state building code be made <br />mandatory statewide for new buildings with en- <br />forcement as follows: any new building to which <br />these provisions apply should be designed to con- <br />form to these provisions by an architect, engineer, <br />or contractor. If the city, or county of the new <br />building is outside a city, does not have a building <br />official, the architect, engineer or contractor <br />shall also inspect the building to certify to the <br />city, or county if located outside a city, that the <br />new building has been constructed in compliance <br />with these provisions. This certification must be <br />completed before any city or county may issue <br />a certificate of occupancy for the building or <br />before the inspection process is completed if no <br />certificate of occupancy is required. <br /> <br />V-6.13uilding and Energy Code (B) <br /> <br /> A uniform, statewide building and energy <br />code should be adopted by the legislature only if <br />thc following optional enforcement methods are <br />included: <br /> <br /> 1. Local option (city, county, or town) inspec- <br />tion and enforcement, except that the code should <br />remain mandatory in the Twin Cities Metropoli- <br />tan A rea. <br /> <br /> 2. State fee inspectors who may be used for <br />inspection in areas outside of communities with <br />local enforcement. <br /> <br /> 3. The housing warranty law should include a <br />one-year warranty that the dwelling be free from <br />defects caused by faulty workmanship and defec- <br />tive materials due to noncompliance with the state <br />building and energy codes. <br /> <br /> 4. All architects and engineers who design any <br />structure must certify that the structure complies <br />with the state building and energy codes. <br /> <br /> 5. Any city should be allowed to adopt more <br />restrictive building standards than the state build- <br /> <br />lng code in order to protect public health and <br />safety. <br /> <br /> 6. Repeal the law providing for a vote and <br />permit any city adopting building code after <br />January 1, 1977, to repeal the code in that city by <br />vote of the council. <br /> <br /> The League recommends that a legislative com- <br />mission on building and energy standards be es- <br />tablished to review the state building and energy <br />codes with the objective of reviewing the rewriting <br />of these standards to assure compliance with <br />federal energy requirements and to remove those <br />parts of the standards not directly related~ to <br />energy conservation and the public's health, wel- <br />fare, and safety. <br /> <br />V-7. Speed Limits (B) <br /> <br /> The League recommends that local authori- <br />ties have the authority to establish speed limits <br />within high pedestrian conflict zones upon the <br />basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, <br />which may be performed by local or county <br />authorities. <br /> <br />V-8. Liquor Issues (B) <br /> <br /> The League strongly supported the legislature <br />when it modified liquor laws to make the number <br />of on-sale liquor licenses issued a matter for <br />local determination and eliminated the phase-out <br />requirement when there are municipal on-sale or <br />off-sale liquor operations. The League recommends <br />that the legislature build on these initiatives by <br />taking the following actions: <br /> <br /> 1. Cities should have the same authority to <br />establish fees for off-sale liquor licenses and on-sale <br />wine licenses that they now have for on-sale liquor <br />and beer licenses and off-sale beer licenses. <br /> <br /> 2. In 1977, the legislature amended those por- <br />tions of the Liquor Civil Damages Act relating to <br />liability for damages and provided that any action <br />must be commenced within one year after the <br />injury. The League does not believe this law <br />should be amended, other than as indicated below, <br />until we have had several years' experience with <br />it. <br /> <br /> 3. The purpose of the required notice within <br />120 days of injury for claims under the Dram Shop <br />Act is to permit alleged suppliers of liquor to <br />investigate the claim before witnesses disappear <br />and memories fail. To allow an unlimited notice <br /> <br />- 23 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.