Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />-7- <br /> <br />information indicates groundwater monitoring at the new site can <br />be adequately monitored by routine methods. However, if in the <br />future new information indicates groundwater can not be monitored <br />adequately at the new site and an acceptable resolution to the <br />problem is not presented the site could not reasonably qualify for <br />MPCA permits. <br /> <br /> Operation of the Existing Oak Grove Sanitary Landfill <br /> <br /> During the comment period the MPCA staff received written <br />comments concerning the present operation of the existing Oak <br />Grove sanitary landfill. The commenters indicated that this pre- <br />sent operation is unsatisfactory. <br /> <br /> It is unknown at this time what entity would operate the pro- <br />posed sanitary landfill if Site D should be developed as an actual <br />landfill. The MPCA staff cannot assume that Site D would be <br />operated improperly for the purposes of the determination of its <br />intrinsic suitability for sanitary landfill use. Therefore the <br />MPCA does not consider the present operation of the Oak Grove <br />sanitary landfill as a basis for certifying Site D as intrin- <br />sically unsuitable. <br /> <br /> Conclusion on Site D <br /> <br /> No new information was introduced into the record which would <br />cause a change in the recommendation that Site D be certified as <br />intrinsically suitable for sanitary landfill use. <br />Site E <br /> <br />No comments or new information on the inherent <br />characteristics of the site were received. The MPCA staff does <br /> <br /> <br />