Laserfiche WebLink
'1 <br /> '1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />:1 <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> i <br /> I <br /> i <br /> <br />-8- <br /> <br />not change the recommendation that Site E be certified as <br />intrinsically suitable for sanitary landfill use. <br />Site P <br /> <br /> Site P was proposed by Anoka County as a sanitary landfill. <br />Based on information available to the MPCA staff on the date of <br />the hearing, the Director recommended that Site P not be <br />certified as intrinsically suitable for either sanitary or <br />demolition landfill use for four reasons: <br /> <br /> 1. The fill area of the site is less than 1,000 feet <br /> from a lake, pond or flowage (number 1 on the ~flowchart). <br /> This determination is based on MPCA Exhibit No. 9, a letter <br /> from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), <br /> stating that an area on the site is a protected water. It is <br /> designated on DNR's Shoreland Management Inventory as wetland <br /> 2-117W and has a natural environment shoreland classification. <br /> This classification, according to Public Exhibit No. 1, <br /> qualifies this area as a lake, pond or flowage. The <br /> requirement of Minn. Rule SW 6(1)(a) for a 1,000 foot setback <br /> eliminates most of the fill area for landfill use. <br /> <br /> 2. The fill area of the site is within a wetland <br /> (number 4 on the flowchart). This determination is based on <br /> MPCA Exhibit No. 9, which states that the site contains a <br /> portion of wetland. <br /> <br /> 3. The site would present a bird hazard to an airport <br /> <br /> (number 5 on the flowchart). This determination is based on <br /> Attachment Seven of MPCA Exhibit No. 5. <br /> <br /> <br />