My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/22/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 09/22/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:40:02 PM
Creation date
5/24/2004 9:33:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/22/1981
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE #6: <br /> <br /> b) Approval/disapproval of number of units to be assessed - <br /> Council will have to adopt resolution approving/disapproving <br /> the Golden's request in this case. It should be noted that <br /> if the City deletes any or all of this assessment, it will <br /> become the City's cost. Enclosure (D2-e) contains the pro- <br /> posed resolution for your review. The following motion will <br /> have to be enacted to adopt the resolution that will be needed <br /> in this case: <br /> <br /> Motion by Coun~i~e~ber ti <'/ ~.:? ~ and seconded by <br /> Councitmember~,?~[~[_.~.~:/i t~ a~o~Resolution #81-.[ ,, <br /> approving/disapprovi,n~ of the' Golden's request to-delete <br /> their assessments. (Please refer to resolution file for <br /> Resolution #81-'- <br /> <br /> Voting no /~'~' ~'/ ..... <br /> <br />FINDINGS OF FACT 'REGARDING/NUMBER:OF'UNITS-'TO:BE-'ASSESSED; CASE OF <br /> <br />MR. DONALD HUFF~ 681I'- 15qTH'LANE.'NW REGARDING STREET PROJECT #80-16: <br /> <br />Council, at their September 8, 1981 regular coUncil meeting, directed <br />that a Findings of Fact be prepared on the above case, as Mr. Huff <br />claimed he should be Only assessed one unit instead of the two units <br />that the City is asssessing him for in this case. Accordingly, the <br />City Building Official and City Engineer made an onzsite inspection <br />and prepared the proposed Findings of Fact which is submitted in <br />enclosume (D2-f) for'your review and action~ <br /> <br />It should be nOted.that if Council deletes any part of this assessment, <br />it will become the City's sha~e. <br /> <br />Council 'Action: Your action'will be as follows in .t, his case: <br /> <br />a) Findings of'Fact - You'will'have to'approve/disapprove/ <br /> amend the'Findings of' Fact.by CoUncil motlon~ The following <br /> proposed motion'is submitted'for'your consideration in this <br /> case: <br /> <br /> Motion'by coung~lm~m~erl~'~'-''' and seconded by <br /> CouncilmembeP~~.-to.approve/&A~s~ppz~Ve/amend <br /> the Findings of Fact (i~ you'disapprove/amend~ you'will <br /> need to Statereason(s')-which'is contained in enclosure <br /> (D2-f) of'the'Council agenda dated' September'22~ 1981, <br /> case of Mm. Donald Huff, 681~ -'154th Lane NW, regarding <br /> the number'of'units to be'assessed regarding Street P~o-' <br /> ject #80-16. - · _ ~ ~ <br /> Motion'carried. Voting yes'. .............. ~ .[ . <br /> Voting no' ............. . <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.