Agenda - Council - 08/25/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

FINDINGS OF FACT Donald Savitskl 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) That the Applicant has properly applied for a Board of Adjustment Variance as required by City Omdinance to construct an attached accessory building larger than allowed by City Ordinance. That the Applicant appeared ~efore the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing pursuant to the City Zoning Ordinance on August 25, 1981. That said public hearing was properly advertised and the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated by reference. That the Applicant by letter has indicated that the proposed accessory building will not be used for any commercial purposes but rather will be used for the storage of personal property. That said letter is hereby incorporated by reference as a part of these findings. That the Applicant has applied for a permit to construct an attached garage of 1,608 square feet' in addition to his existing attached garage of 624 square feet. That said proposed addition would result in an attached garage area of 2,232 square feet. 6) That said proposed garage area would exceed the limitations of the Ramsey City Ordinance which would restrict accessory structures on property of this size to ~,488 Square feet maximum combining the attached/ detached areas allowable by'ordinance.' 7) That such a Variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property similar to that possessed by other properties in the same district and in the same .vicinity. 8) 9) lO) 11) 12) That the authorizing of such a Variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent properties and will not materially impair the intent and purpose of this ordinance or the public interest. That the condition or situation of the specific piece of property is not so general or re-occupant in natume as to make reasonably practicle the formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situations. That the Variance Observes the'spirit and intent of the Ordinance and is not contrary to the public interest. That properly constructed, the structume would comply with the require- ments of the State Building Code. That the setback of the proposed structure would be somewhat less than that required by Ordinance on a thoroughfare street.