My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Joint with EPB
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/20/2015 - Joint with EPB
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:22:51 AM
Creation date
4/4/2016 11:45:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Joint with EPB
Document Date
04/20/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />"Counting the Votes on <br />Council Actions, Part 1 and <br />Part 2," Minnesota Cities <br />(May and June -July 2006, p. <br />19). <br />Minn. Stat. § 410.12. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.3535, subd. <br />1, 2. <br />Minn. Stat. § 462.3535, subd. <br />4. <br />Because state statute vests planning commissions with these mandatory <br />duties, it is unclear how a city that has abolished its planning commission <br />would proceed under state statute with necessary amendments to official <br />controls, purchase and sale of property and capital improvements. <br />B. Modifying the planning agency <br />Planning commissions created by city ordinance may be modified by an <br />ordinance amendment (for example, to change a from a five to seven <br />member commission). The ordinance must be approved by a simple majority <br />of city council members present at the meeting. Planning commissions <br />created by city charter can only be modified by a charter amendment. <br />VI. Joint or multijurisdictional planning <br />State statutes create multiple means for cities to collaborate with other <br />governmental bodies, including other cities, counties and towns, on <br />comprehensive land use planning <br />A. Community -Based planning <br />Cities are encouraged, but not required, to prepare and implement a <br />community-based comprehensive municipal plan. This language is very <br />similar to comprehensive planning as discussed above, but is not the same. <br />Community-based comprehensive municipal plans contain an element of <br />orderly annexation and/or boundary adjustment planning along with <br />traditional land use and community planning <br />In cities that opt for community-based comprehensive municipal plans, the <br />city must coordinate its plan with the plans, if any, of the county and the <br />city's neighbors. Cooperation is designed to: <br />• Prevent the plan from having an adverse impact on other jurisdictions. <br />• Complement the plans of other jurisdictions. <br />In cities that opt for community-based comprehensive municipal plans, the <br />city must prepare its plan to be incorporated into the county's community- <br />based comprehensive plan, if the county is preparing or has prepared one, <br />and must otherwise assist and cooperate with the county in its community- <br />based planning <br />Community-based comprehensive municipal plans do not appear to be <br />common. Cities interested in this option should consult their city attorney or <br />a planning consultant. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/20/2015 <br />Planning Commission Guide Page 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.