My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 01/25/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2016
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 01/25/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 11:55:18 AM
Creation date
4/4/2016 11:52:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
01/25/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Excerpt from Planning Commission <br />January 7, 2016 <br />5.03: Review Sketch Plan for Northfork Alpine Addition (Project No. 16-02); Case of <br />Double T, LLC <br />Presentation <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented the staff report stating the purpose of this <br />file is to review the official Sketch Plan prepared by A.P.A Consulting, Engineers &Surveyors, <br />P.A. for the purpose of a four -lot subdivision located on Alpine Drive within the Northfork <br />Planned Unit Development. The Sketch Plan Review process affords the Planning Commission <br />to opportunity to provide early direction on the layout of the proposed plat, before the Developer <br />prepares detailed Preliminary Plat plans. A key decision will occur at Preliminary Plat, in which <br />the layout will be approved, subject to approving final construction plans and Final Plat <br />documents. At that time, the City will review items including, but not limited to, Grading Plan, <br />Utility Plan, Landscape Plan, and Street Light Plan. Staff recommended the Planning <br />Commission provide feedback on the Sketch Plan and direct the Developer to proceed to <br />preparing a Preliminary Plat, with the considerations listed in this staff report. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Bauer asked where a common septic system would be located if this option were <br />recommended. Community Development Director Gladhill reported the system would be <br />located on one of the existing lots and would not impact minimum lot sizes. <br />Commissioner VanScoy questioned what assurances the City had that the proposed homeowners <br />association (HOA) would still be in place in 20 years to provide maintenance to the shared septic <br />system. Community Development Director Gladhill discussed the requirements that would have <br />to be put in place to ensure the HOA was still in existence. <br />Commissioner Bauer inquired if the cul-de-sac would be a public or private roadway. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated the cul-de-sac was proposed to be a public <br />street that would be owned and maintained by the City. <br />Chairperson Levine asked if the City received any comment from surrounding property owners. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reported staff has not received any comments to <br />date. <br />Chairperson Levine questioned what information staff was seeking from the Commission this <br />evening. Community Development Director Gladhill requested the Planning Commission <br />provide feedback to the developer on the proposed sketch plan and whether or not the group <br />supported the use of a shared septic system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.