Laserfiche WebLink
tU <br />Evaluation Summary <br />The safety and mobility results were also plotted as a line graph to show the relative benefit and cost of each <br />project group improvement compared to the ultimate freeway vision of the corridor. The freeway is estimated <br />to cost more than $300,000,000 and is assumed to provide an average Level of Service C (27.5 seconds of <br />delay per vehicle) for the cross street movements. These values serve as the 100 percent benefit and cost <br />targets shown on the graphs. <br />Opalration Benefit -vs -Project Cast <br />t:d ietm P1 lltfk <br />a ia. <br />• WA. <br />Filrrizo <br />OptolkllerrOltmh 'IFe10f1<I5l(4 <br />TM►yy� <br />• xml.uw <br />Lower Cast - High 9enolit Approach <br />9056 of Operaiianat Benefit <br />for Less Than SO% of Cost <br />$Si $104 Slip $21) S25G $7f1 <br />Cosi ISmi <br />1: <br />OpFnl1<aalr�iTrh PIF1WS <br />!p% a !nivel Flxin7 <br />• !=t+, 9, w <br />bpiTdmpl ' <br />ttl <br />s. 197. <br />4' <br />sit <br />gm <br />Lower Cast - High 9enerit Approach <br />Ffl 9556 of Safety Benefit <br />10% for Less than SO% of Cost <br />05h <br />Safety Benefit -vs -Project Cost <br />Skit Tom PrAv` . . <br />- flew' <br />9Rtfi31! P FPtI![ <br />MfPh <br />LIP <br />5 $Si $!pA SI ;• $2111 515D $gip <br />Ccs1 1 SW <br />The S -curves depict the relative benefit compared to the freeway vision of completing each of the project groups <br />for both mobility and safety measures. These graphs show that the greatest benefits come by removing traffic <br />signals compared to at -grade or access management solutions. The information derived from these graphs was <br />used to identify priority projects within the implementation plan. <br />HIGHWAY 10 ACCESS PLANNING STUDY 71 <br />