10/02/78 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

P&Z 10/2/78 Mr. Skeim stated "there need not be a copy of the covenant, only between the buyer and seller. Attorney Goodrich stated there is a conflict of City Zoning vs. Covenant, due to the fact that accessory buildings are tabled at the present time. City Administrator, Mr. Schnelle said, "A covenant must accompany the sketch plan, so both can be acted on". Motion by Art Dunn, Seconded by Gerald Zimmerman, a recommendation be made ' to City Council that Mr. Skeim be allowed to continue his plan for accessory buildings to be minimum 320 sq ft, Maximum not to exceed 1% of the size of the lot. Motion carried. Voting yes: Bodle , West, Dunn, Zimmerman gt~ng no: . Sorteberg, Peterson b$~aln: mone Dr. Anderson - Dental Clinic - Rezone'from'R-1 to'Bzl in the transitional area Chrm. Ken Peterson directed question to Attorney Goodrich, to ammend the comprehensive plan accordingly. Mr. Anderson stated he has a transitional type of development, acting as a buffer zone, to the commercial area. John Berglund, Attorney for Mr. Anderson, felt the Clinic best as a buffer as no residential home would be built across from Commercial Zoned property. Art Braun, Admin of Coon Rapids Clinic, presented in the past, a plan to P & Z as to where Medical buildings be developed. He wants the City to take a close look. Tom Anderson and Roger Austin felt they have followed procedure. Jerry Zimmerman stated P & Z must prepare themselves for other types of rezoning. Also, in creating a special zoning, to spell out what things are wanted. Motion by Ron West and Seconded by A1 Sorteberg to stay with original motion adopted at a Special Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission dated August 21, 1978. Plus adoption of finding of fact (which was presented by developer) as follows except paragraph #7 (which read: That the proposed use and activities are generally compatible with all other aspects of the comprehensive plan): Finding of Fact 1. The proposed zoning change would tend to promote the location of highly desirable and needed activities in the City, which are now lacking, to-wit, a dental clinic; 2. The proposed location of this facility is such as would provide convenient access to a significant portion of Ramsey citizens, without creating any adverse traffic conditions or hazards; and is generally compatible with the transportation portion of the Comprehensive Plan;