Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Shryock not~d the p!ar~ might change once the missing pictures were received. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shr.7ock stated she d id ~ot particularly like the layout, as it seemed confusing, and <br />a description of thc trail and higl,lighting of major amenities would be preferable. Pictures <br />should not includ(: such a detaile, l description of the trail's route. The text should tell the <br />purpose of thc trail and why thc sii:e was chosen. She indicated it should be kept as simple as <br />possible. <br /> <br />Chairperson John:; agreed that rte text should discuss regional significance and offered <br />amenities. It should be "a bit ora s;~lcs; pitch." <br /> <br />Commissioner Shryock added info 'marion should be given regarding the interesting features of <br />the trail. These changes would mat, e tl~e trail explanations a more user friendly guideline. <br /> <br />Parks and Utilities Supervisor Riw rblood indicated he did not know of any required action that <br />was needed unless more spa:cities v. ere given regarding Section 3. <br /> <br />Parks and Utilitie:~ Supe~visor Ri~;erblood noted he had all of the aerial photographs if the <br />Commission wishc~d to review then after the meeting. <br /> <br />Chairperson .Iohns stated some the en~:;ths and cost estimates seemed to be outdated. <br /> <br />Parks and Utilities: Supervisor Riw:rblood agreed there was a need to itemize. After significant <br />effort, staff h~.d '_t master ~trail t,lan in AutoCAD and could easily make maps for grant <br />applications, for example. <br /> <br />Comlnissioncr Shtyock st~ggested l i~e r;ection be an addendum, which could be replaced easily as <br />the informati(m bc(:ame ouidatcd. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olcis suggested info~ marion be included without the cost estimate. <br /> <br />Parks and Utilities Super,:isor Rive:rblood responded it might be valuable to have the cost <br />estimate included, as Council coul( th~;n understand the cost impact. <br /> <br />Commissionor Shryock stated she l?c:l~, information could be included in the main section with <br />reference made to a financing secti, m that would be easy to change. <br /> <br />Parks and Utilities Supervisor Riw-rblood responded he thought that was workable; however, the <br />Commission had suggested it was inconvenient to go back and forth between documents. He <br />thought it would l~e understood th: llgures were 2004 cost estimates and the numbers could be <br />changed when needed. <br /> <br />Commission(~r Olds indicated the t:ollar amounts should be left in Section 3, with a notation that <br />the cost cstima!:es ~vere 2004 prices. <br /> <br />Park and l :ecreation Commission/April 8, 2004 <br /> Page 11 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />