Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Chairperson Nixt, second, led by Commissioner Jeffrey to recommend that City Council <br />approve the recluc~t l'or an lnterin~ U?,e Permit to place temporary classroom buildings on the <br />P.A.C.T. Chartc,~r School site until (~c~ober 15, 2004 and adopt a resolution declaring the terms of <br />tiao permit, witl~ tln(; Following additiom~l conditions: <br /> <br />1. That no~ loses than 130 parki.% stalls are available on improved streets or a combination of <br /> improved si rccts and az temp~)rary parking surface finished with Class 5 materials. <br />2. ~l'hat a partial occupancy per,nit be received from the City Building Inspector for access to <br /> tine portions.. ()t'the premises .tes(zribed in the applicant's materials. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chai~'person Nixt, Commissioners Jeffrey, and Shepherd. Voting <br />No: None. /~bscn~t: Comn]issJon_',rs Johnson, Van Scoy and Watson. Commissioner Brauer <br />abstained. <br /> <br />Case//3: <br /> <br />I'ub[ic Hearing---i{lequest for Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Case of <br />Patrick Fitzpatrick <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Assistant Con]n~un ity l)evelopmenl Director Trudgeon further advised the subject property was <br />designated commei'cial in the Coml~rcl-~ensive Plan and zoning map prior to the adoption of the <br />2001 Comprehensive l'lm~. 'l'he 2(i01 Comprehensive Plan now shows the property located at <br />9150 l liglnway 10 as lx)w Density Iq esidential. Patrick Fitzpatrick resides on the subject property <br />and rcccntly bccan-~c aware of the 9arcel's residential land use designation. He indicated Mr. <br />Fitzpatrick docs m~t agree with thc residential designation and is requesting a comprehensive <br />plan amendment to change tlne land us~; designation from Low Density Residential to Places to <br />Shop. <br /> <br />Assistant COIDI'iiLIn} [y l)evelopment Di rector Trudgeon noted that the City Council has expressed <br />that they xvant lifts i>ropcrty to rema in residential, and Staff has received three letters opposed to <br />the rczoning request. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Pat Fitzpatrick stat(,¢l he is asking f(r mixed use, not just B-2. He indicated he has aerial photos <br />that show how this; lays om. lie s;ated since filling out the application he has spoken with a <br />realtor and believes mixed use is tllt~ best zoning. He indicated the letters of opposition say they <br />do not want a business there, and i~e can understand that. He commented the owner at 9340 <br />wanled mixed use ~md was granted ;t and not charged for the change. He stated he is asking for <br />tine same tlfing. <br /> <br />Assistant (2>mmtmity Development Director Trudgeon noted for a mixed use PUD, there is not <br />cnougtn acreage on lhis parcel so it v, ould have to be B-2. <br /> <br />l'ianning Commission/May 6, 2004 <br /> Page 7 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />