Laserfiche WebLink
Citizen Input <br /> <br />Motion by Chai rpt~'son Nixt, seconded by JelTrey to close the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Jeffrey, Brauer and Shepherd. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Corem ssi,mers Johnson, Van Scoy and Watson. <br /> <br />Commission <br /> <br />Motion by Chairpc..'son Nixl,, secon~ ied by Commissioner Brauer to recommend that City Council <br />adopt Findings of l,'act unfavorable to the applicant relating to a request from Patrick Fitzpatrick <br />to rezone thc subjc,::t property fi'om i?,-1 Residential to B-2 Business. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Brauer, Jeffrey and Shepherd. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissi~mers Johnson, Van Scoy and Watson. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairpr~rson Nixt, seco~ded by Commissioner Jeffrey to recommend that the City <br />Council deny lhe rc'ctucst for rczonir~g. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairpe~'son Nixt, Commissioners Jeffrey, Brauer and Shepherd. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commi~;si~mersJohnson, Van ScoyandWatson. <br /> <br />Case//5 <br /> <br />Rcq.est for Site Pla~'~ Review; Case of Hermanson Homes <br /> <br />Presentati(m <br /> <br />Associate l>lanner Geisler stated H:rmanson Homes is proposing to construct a 10,000 square <br />foot multi4emmt ~l'lSce building o~ the property generally located on the comer of Armstrong <br />Boulevard and Riv,~'rdal¢ I)rive. She indicated the proposed office building is located in the B-2 <br />Highway Business I)istricl and is listed as a permitted use in that district. The subject property is <br />approximately 1.35 acres, 2)r tota~ lot coverage of 17%. She stated the proposed building <br />appears to meet thc~ required sctbaci;s~ but a revised site plan will need to be submitted showing <br />these setbacks fi'on-} thc propet'ty linc. ra'[her than the curb. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated commented a revised landscaping plan will be required. She <br />notcd because lbo subjec! loroperty borders residential property to the south, the project must <br />meet buffcryard requirements as ot~tlii~ed in City Code. The new Pleasureland RV facility is <br />located one lot to ~hc cast of this sil~. l~leasureland was required to put in a privacy fence along <br />the southern propcity line el' all fbu' el their lots. Staff would like the Planning Commission to <br />weigh in on whcthc, r this Imlicc. t sh~uid include a privacy fence in the same location. She stated <br />it should bc not~'d that there wrmld iCe a gap in the fence in the lot directly to the east, until that <br />lot develops. <br /> <br />Associate l'lanner ~,;eisler indicated thc. submitted plan shows vinyl siding on a portion of the <br />building. She statc'd City Code doc ~; not permit vinyl siding in the B-2 District. The applicant <br /> <br />?lann ing Commission/May 6, 2004 <br /> Page 9 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />