My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/08/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council - 06/08/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:27:06 PM
Creation date
6/4/2004 2:54:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/08/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councihncmber K.~lmk que~dioned how it was even feasible to think that City sewer and water <br />would be extended to the area by nc'<t year, <br /> <br />City Admil]islmtor Nonmm nc)led ~hat the City Council did authorize the extension of the City <br />sower and xvatcr to/\rmstrong Bou] :yard. <br /> <br />Cotmcilmcmbcr [:,ivig stated that t was his understanding that the project the City Council <br />approved cx/emled (',ity services to Mmstrong Boulevard as well as to the south side of Highway <br />#10. <br /> <br />A ssi stent ( ;omen m~ity Dcvel oplnent Director Trudgeon replied that was correct. <br /> <br />Councilmembcr Pearson stated that thc current problem is that people who own property in the <br />proposed col't'idor arc being prevent, ;d 'l't'om doing anything with their property. <br /> <br />,lira Nielsen, repros;curing property ~>wl~ers along Alxnstrong Boulevard south of the fire station, <br />explained that a ptt~'CIlase agreemeni was written for the property that was ready to close until the <br />developers went lo the City and found out that what was happening in the area was in limbo. <br />O,]cc thc developer's learned that (.R. ~116 rnight be extended tl'u'ough the property it stopped <br />the sale. '['hal is o~ly one of many tra~-~sactions that have fallen apart because the City is unsure <br />of what is going to happen in that 9articular area. Developers are coming to the City ready to <br />develop, but they need a policy frol~ tile City Council on where the roads are going to go. That <br />being said lie mali7es it is a big decision, but the landowners need to know what to do with their <br />property. <br /> <br />Mayor (temco :stated that if the Cit> is able to get the bridge in 20 years that would be a miracle <br />but cxtemling lllc mad to thc noFtl-~ inio Ell< River is so far out that he did not thi~¢ that was <br />something they cotlld even plata for :it cl~is time. <br /> <br />Councihncmber Elvig stated that hc thought there was a more immediate concern with the Town <br />C, cntcr. Any decision the (Jotmcil makes pertaining to roads impacts the Town Center greatly <br />because thc State is requiring one mile between on and off ramps, which could mean that <br />Armstrong [~oulcvard could be shui elf. For that reason alone he wants to first focus on that <br />issue and then work fi'om thc~-e. Tho At-mstrong corridor has to stay open if they want the Town <br />Center to succeed. <br /> <br />Mayor Galnec stated that in thc pas~ thr.: City has talked about extending C.R. #116 to Jarvis and <br />iFthat were to happ,m he would not be hesitant to develop some of the land. <br /> <br />Councilmembc~- Slmlnmen qucstiot ~ed il' they could realistically separate the issue of extending <br />#169 Ii'om tilt: I'utu~-c river bridge crt ssing. <br /> <br />City Administrato~' Norman stated that lac would suggest that the City Council focus on the <br />extcnsioI1 of (:.R. ,Zll O to the rive~ br'idge crossing and direct The Tinldenberg Group to have <br />discussions with the, di fl'crci~tt groups rc~¢u'ding the #169 corridor. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session/May 4, 2004 <br /> Page 5 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.