Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor (hm~cc stat<:d that hc thoughi th,.'. Council should be looking at the extension of C.R. #116 <br />to Jarvis Slrcct and then allow the m'ea i.o develop. <br /> <br />Cmmcihncmbcr C~ok inquired if ihey would be primarily looking at residential development <br />arotuld thc ltl 16 extension. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman replied ,/es, <br /> <br />Councilmeml~cr C(x)l,: agreed/hat t'4c City should concentrate on extending C.R. #116 to Jarvis <br />Street with an interchange at that lo(,atian. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman agreed that they have to prioritize and focus on C.R. itl 16 but that <br />docs not mcan that they need to igm;re i!tighway #169. <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Zi:nmerman stated that regardless of the corridor going south of Highway #10 <br />across thc river they can work wiih the area north of Highway #10. He suggested that The <br />Tinklcnbcrg (h'oup work on that iss~te and then bring it back to the Council. <br /> <br />C',ounci/mcml)cr I(ural< stated that she thought the City should look at what they would be doing <br />with C.R. fl116 ii'II,crc was no prop,,)sed river bridge crossing and then work from there. <br /> <br />CoLmcihnembcr Elvig state(l that he did not think it would be likely for MnDOT to approve two <br />new roacls and lwo new overpasses witlfin a quarter mile. <br /> <br />City Administrate; Norman replied that that is the importance of developing a formal <br />transportation policy. <br /> <br />Cotmcillnembcr K urak inquired if'st:afl' was proposing to have The Tinklenberg Group review the <br />options [bt C.12,. fl116. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman r'cl~lied ~,e~-;. <br /> <br />Councilmcmbcr Stronlmen inquired ii' al formal transportation policy would include other areas <br />oFthe City such as T. II. #47 and ttik, hx'vay #10. <br /> <br />City A d m i n istral or ~ cmn an mI) Ii ed u bsol utely. <br /> <br />Mr. John $hardlmx~ representing thc Nathe property owners as a land use planning consultant, <br />explained lhat thc Nathe property ha,x the proposed 600-foot corridor for the future bridge <br />crossing, lie explained, that Mr. Nathe contacted his attorney to discuss the concerns he had <br />about what was being ctiscusscd for his property and then contacted him about the concerns. <br />Alier being contacted by thc Nathe':~ hc came to the City to put together as much information as <br />possible to properl5 advise thc Nath ;'s. When they first looked at the issue Mr. Nathe was very <br />upset because he', w:mted to continue f~u ming the land but with the road crossing being proposed <br /> <br />(;it:), Cot~ncii Work Session/May 4, 2004 <br /> Page 6 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />