My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 06/01/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2004
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 06/01/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:26:57 PM
Creation date
6/7/2004 3:05:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
06/01/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Northstar Corridor Ramsey Station <br />Rail Station Feasibility Study <br /> <br />Operating Plan · <br />Baseline Alternative Modifications <br />The Ba. seline Alternative for the Northstar Corridor Rail Project was developed by Manuel <br />Padron & Associates. To analyze the impacts to the Baseline Alternative, Manuel Padron <br />evaluated the impact of a rail station in the City of Ramsey. The Baseline Alternative for the Big <br />Lake-to-Minneapolis scenario (without the Ramsey station) assumed the following route <br />patterns and daily peak-period service level of bus service: <br /> <br /> · Big Lake-Elk River-Riverdale-Minneapolis: 4 peak-period bus trips, peak direction only <br /> <br /> · Elk River-Minneapolis: 6 peak-period bus trips, peak direction only <br /> <br /> · Anoka-Riverdale-Minneapolis: 4 peak-period bus trips, peak direction only <br /> <br /> · Big Lake-Elk River-Anoka-Riverdale: 2 peak-period bus trips, both directions <br /> <br />In addition, there was one round trip in the midday that made stops at all locations (Big Lake to <br />Minneapolis). <br /> <br />For this new scenario, it is proposed that a Ramsey stop be added to the Elk River-Minneapolis <br />route pattern, and to the Big Lake-Elk River-Anoka-Riverdale route pattern. This stop would also <br />be added to the midday round trip. Revised bus travel time estimates for the affected route <br />pattern are presented in Appendix A. <br /> <br />There are no changes proposed for the local Metro Transit service beyond what was already <br />proposed in previous service plans. There is presently a Route 805 that operates at hourly <br />service frequencies between the Anoka Technical College and the Northtown Transit Hub. This <br />route could be extended west to the Ramsey commuter bus stop. <br /> <br />Commuter Rail Alternative Modifications <br />The proposed commuter rail service plan for the Northstar Corridor Rail Project was developed <br />by LTK Engineering Services, which evaluated the modifications necessary to include Ramsey <br />as a station stop along the corridor. The proposed commuter rail service plan reflects 5 peak <br />direction and 3 reverse peak direction trips in each peak period, in addition to one midday round <br />trip. The following timetables, Tables 2-6 and 2-7, illustrate an eastbound and westbound <br />Northstar Corridor service alternative between Big Lake and downtown Minneapolis. A station <br />for Ramsey is included in this example between Elk River and Anoka. In this case, it is also <br />assumed that the maintenance facility previously assumed for Elk River is located instead at .the <br />Big Lake terminus. Two of the four trainsets will also use this facility for midday layover; two will <br />have midday layover in downtown Minneapolis, as in previous plans. <br /> <br />The BNSF mainline between Elk River and Anoka is relatively straight and flat, with an author- <br />ized maximum passenger train speed of 79 mph for almost the entire 9.7 miles. Without an <br />intermediate stop, commuter trains take advantage of these speed conditions with a scheduled <br />travel time of 8 minutes eastbound and 9 westbound. The addition of a station at Ramsey will <br />require trains to decelerate, make a station stop, and accelerate ba~:k to speed over a track seg- <br />ment where trains would otherwise run through at 79 mph. The difference would be about 4 <br />minutes, depending on assumptions and conditions. For illustrative purposes, 4 minutes will be <br />assumed as the additional running time between Elk River and Anoka imposed by the addition: <br /> <br />Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2-'7 March 2004 ; <br /> <br />-8- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.