Laserfiche WebLink
ISSUES IN CONTRACflNG <br />FOR PUBLIC SERVICES <br />FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR <br /> <br />contracting for public se~dce fro~a the private <br />sector-an arrangement that h~s ~ lot of oppor-' <br />tunity and advantages but at the ~a~ne time many <br />pitfalls for local government. Contracting c~n cover- <br />almost any service traditionally provided by local gov- <br />ernments. Indeed, the range of conuacts h~ ~xistence <br />today, and the ways in which they are implemented and - <br />administered, provides a sample of whvt ~a-vices are <br />being contracted to the private ~ector: <br /> <br />· Carlisle, Pennsylvazia contracts for re~ddential solid <br /> waste collection, snow plowing, traffic ~4gnal instaIla. <br /> tion, parking mete~ maintenance, Uee trimming, <br /> inspection/code enforcement, vehicle to~ and star- <br /> age, animal control, building and gmtmdz mainte- <br /> nance, legal service, and labor relations. <br />· San loaquin County, California contra~ for services <br /> in 33 different areas, <br />· The city of San Diego established a privstc, nonprofit <br /> corporation to provide data processing support for <br /> the city; it provides flexibility in hiring and retaining <br /> personnel and purchasing equipment. <br />· New Rochelle. New York has substantial contracting <br /> in areas such as public works, vehicl~ towing and <br /> storage, recreation facilities, park landscaping, and <br /> other support functions. <br />· Tulsa, and other cities with solid waste ~,ollcction con- <br /> tracts, pcnaliT¢ collectors through a chaise system for <br /> missed collections nlld spillage. <br />· Charlottesville, Virginia utilizes nonprofit organiza- <br /> tions extensively for contracting work. <br /> <br />This month's report was prepared by Donald Fisk. <br />Mr, Fisk is an independent consultant working in state <br />and local government productivity issue~, He was for- <br />inertly with The Urban Institute, Rand Co~ra!ion, and <br />the County of ~an Diego. He is coauthor of the book <br />Private Provision of Public Service: An ~vervicw, pub- <br />lished by The Urban 'Institute. <br /> <br />Contrn__~._ns is becomi~ a more popular option for local <br />governments to~n~ to pro-Adc an tdequnte level of public <br />service with · revenue base that can't seem to keep <br />up. Contracti%. ma)' be entered into by · local $overn. <br />meat in an attempt to reduce costs, or improve service <br />or effectiveness. <br /> While contractin~ out services by local governments is <br />increasingly popular, many local ~overnment officials <br /> <br />and the ~mifications of interrupted service. <br /> This report ts designed to be a broad look atthe most <br />important issues in contractlns~ the cri'teria a local Soy- <br />eminent should use in evaluating their need for con- <br />tracting, with an overview of the factors affecting the <br />use of contracting. The report is concluded with a list of <br />questions to ask when studyin~ the posa'bility of con- <br />tracting a service. This report is not intended to be a <br />specific "how-to" lesson in settin~ up a specific type of <br />service contracting. It is intended as a critical look at the <br />ixsues involved in contracting, and should serve as a <br />reminder to local government officials of all the important <br /> <br /> <br />