Agenda - Council - 04/28/1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I'ROFO$~D FINDINCS OF FACT HR. CARY OSTLDKO Io That ~r. Gary Ostlund~ hereinafter referred to as ~Applicantu, has applied for .~ conditional use permit to operate an electrical contracting business fro~ his o~n hom~ i~ the RI-R Rural Residential District. 2. That aha- Applicant [,aa appeared before the Planning and Zoning Commission for a public hearin$ pursuant to Section lY0.013D of the City Code on April. ?, 1987 and ~h~t said public hearing was properly advertised and minutes of that public hearing are hereby incorporated by reference. 3. That the property which is the subject of the application is located at 14290 Alpaca Street N.~, ~hich property is legally described as follows: Lot 5, Block i, Alpaca Estates, 2nd Additions Anoka County, Minnesota That the subject par,;el i~ approximately 2.5 acres in size and is located in the R1-R Rural Residential District. 5. That an electrical con,ratting business is not a permitted use in the R1-R Rural Residential District. 6. That the adjacent pr~,perties are zoned and used for single family residential development. 7. That the Applicant is proposing to operate his contracting business from the subject parcel and has stated that he is currently storing materials for this busines~ in the garage at that property and is currently storing t~o vehicles for the business on the subject property. 8. That the proposed c0nt.racting business will increase traffic to the subject pr opt~,rty. 9. That ~he proposed contracting business viii be detrimental to persons living in the vicinity of the use as that is not a consistent use with the residential aoning. 10. That the proposed cont,'acting business will substantially adversely impair the use and enjo}'~ment of surrounding properties as it is not consistent wi. th the residential intent of the zone. 11. That ~he proposed contracting business will not be harmonious with and in accordance with specific objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 12. That the proposed cont.~acting business viii be disturbing to existing and future neighboring res i_dential uses. 13. That the proposed coatracting business will not be a substantial improvement to property in the innnediate vicinity, 14. That the proposed co.~tracting use will be adequately served by essential -public service~.