Laserfiche WebLink
15. That tht proposed ccnCract£n$ business rill not ceeate excessive <br />additional requir~euts at public cost for public facilities and services. <br /> <br />16. That the proposed contFactiug business viii not be consistent vith the <br />intent and purposes of th~ City's Zonin$ Chapter. <br /> <br />17. That 8eci:ion 170o0151 of the City Code prohibits the exterior storase <br />of business equipment for home occupations. <br /> <br />18. That Sec~;iou 170.015I si' the City Code specifies that permitted home <br />occupations aha11 not include the ~nployment of any persons not residing on <br />the premises ~ <br /> <br />19. That Section 170,01.',:I does not allow exterior displays of home <br />occupations. <br /> <br />20. That i:he City recei~'ec. Letters from Hal and Judy l/eisenburger, 8005 <br />142nd Avenue N.I/o; William. and gichelle Kropski, 7929 142nd Avenue N.~.; <br />Dean and ~a~ylee Bitner 7884, 142ud Avenue N.~.; Patrick and Sheryl <br />Boedigheimer, 79~4 i~2nd i~venue N.~.; and Donald and Patricia 01son, 8000 <br />l~2nd Avenue N.~. opposed to Hr. Ostlund*s request. <br /> <br />21. That ~he subjec~ prop.,rty i~ located in teh Critical River 0verlay <br />District, <br /> <br />22. That i:he Depar~ent of l~a~ural Resources had no comments regarding the <br />Appl icant"s request o <br /> <br />23. <br /> <br />24. <br /> <br />25. <br /> <br />26. <br /> <br /> <br />