Laserfiche WebLink
OW t hi lon: To work together ko respotibiy grow oar community, and to provide quality, cost -affective, and efckent government tet does. <br />CC Regular Session 7. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 06/28/2016 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #16-06-119 Regarding the Final Plat for The Station; Case of D. R. Horton (Project No. 16-09) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City has received an Application for Final Plat Approval for a 77-unit townhome development located in The <br />COR. This plat was originally approved in 2005 and again in 2008, first as Ramsey Town Center 6th Addition, and <br />secondly as Gables Terrace, each with minor modifications (unrelated to the number of lots proposed). The <br />Preliminary Plat was approved by the City Council on May 24, 2016. <br />Notification: <br />Staff attempted to notify all Property Owners within 350 feet of the Subject Property. The Notice of Public Hearing <br />was published in the Anoka County Union Herald. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The proposed subdivision generally meets all requirements for The COR Zoning District, with necessary <br />modifications as outlined in the Staff Review Letter. <br />The proposed density is slightly higher than the maximum fifteen (15) units per acre prescribed in this sub -district <br />for medium density. Ramsey Town Center 2nd addition, which consists of the two (2) blocks west of the the project <br />site, was developed at a density of 12.1 units per acre. The Station, as proposed, is 15.78 units per acre. When <br />averaging the two phases, the overall D.R. Horton development achieves a net density of 13.94 units per acre. <br />Civil Engineering Plans are generally acceptable to the City Engineer, with amendments outlined in the Staff <br />Review Letter. <br />Landscape Plans & Environmental Policy Board (EPB) Review. The EPB reviewed the Landscape Plan at their <br />March 21, 2016 meeting. The EPB recommended that the interior plantings be reallocated so that the south facing <br />units had more deciduous trees in front of them. The revised Landscape Plan is generally acceptable with revisions <br />outlined in the Staff Review Letter. <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Preliminary Plat at their April 7, 2016 meeting. There were <br />no written or verbal comments received. The Planning Commission raised a concern about the density of the <br />development. The Planning Commission tabled action on the Preliminary Plat to the May meeting for additional <br />information on the past approvals of this project as well as densities of surrounding developments. At their May 5, <br />2016 meeting, the Planning Commission again reviewed the request as well as the previously requested <br />information. They were generally supportive of the project with the exception of the proposed density. The Planning <br />Commission noted that the density should be reduced such that it did not exceed fifteen (15) units per acre and that <br />the calculation for Net Density shallexcludelocal rights of way. The City Council ultimately approved the <br />