Laserfiche WebLink
For example, Chanhassen's total allocation is higher than Maplewood's, largely because <br />Chanhassen has a lower share of existing affordable housing than Maplewood does. But <br />because a higher share of Chanhassen's existing affordable units lie in the 51 %-80% <br />band than in Maplewood, Chanhaooen\u allocation in the 51Y6-80Y6 band is reduced, <br />and W18p|evv00d\u 8U0o8ti0n in the 51Y6-80Y6 band is increased, such that Ch8nh8GGen\s <br />allocation in this band is actually lower than W1ap|evvood'o. <br />Table B-6: Calculation of Allocation for Each Band <br />Total allocation <br />Band from Part 2 <br />Chanhassen <br />Maplewood <br />� <br />Share of regional <br />Need in each <br />band <br />Band breakdown <br />shares from <br />Stop 2 <br />/ <br />Allocation in each <br />57.6m *64 <br />24.5% 197 <br />18.0% 14s <br />49.1% 250 <br />18.6% es <br />32.3m 165 <br />HOUSING POLICY PLAN Appendices <br />