Laserfiche WebLink
16. That the aggregate extraction operation will increase the traffic to <br />the subject property and surrounding area. <br /> <br />17. That access to the site is from County Roads ~116 and ~56. <br /> <br />18. That the aggregate extraction operation will be detrimental to persons <br />residing in the vicinity of such use in that the operations will generate a <br />significant increase in traffic to the area. <br /> <br />19. That the aggregate extraction operation will adversely impair the <br />enjoyment of surrounding properties, especially the adjacent residential <br />property, due to increased traffic to the area. <br /> <br />20. That the traffic generated by the aggregate extraction operation will <br />be disturbing for a period of time to neighboring uses. <br /> <br />21. That the Applicant has stated that aggregates will be extracted to such <br />an elevation so that the subject property is suitable for future industrial <br />development. <br /> <br />22. That the aggregate extraction operation will be served adequately by <br />essential public facilities such as County Roads ~116 and ~56. <br /> <br />23. That~ the aggregate extraction operation will not create excessive <br />additional .requirements at public cost for public facilities. <br /> <br />24. That the aggregate extraction operation will not involve activities <br />that will be detrimental to persons or property in the vicinity. <br /> <br />25. That the Applicant originally applied for a conditional use permit to <br />extract aggregates and to construct a bituminous asphalt plant on the <br />subject property. However, the Applicant has withdrawn the application for <br />the bituminous asphalt plant and is now requesting a conditional use permit <br />to extract aggregates. <br /> <br />26. That the proposed site grading and drainage plan adequately addresses <br />concerns of the Department of Natural Resources regarding storm drainage <br />with adequate capacity for a 100 year rainfall runoff. <br /> <br />27. That the Ramsey Airport Commission is opposed to the proposed aggregate <br />extraction and asphalt operations for the following reasons: <br /> <br />a. The proposed uses conflict with the current Comprehensive Plan; <br />b. The proposed uses are adjacent to a residential neighborhood; <br />c. The proposed uses would create excessive noise, traffic, smoke, <br /> fumes and odors; <br />d. The proposed uses would impact Gateway North Airport; and <br />e. The City is currently in the process of enacting an airport <br /> zoning ordinance which pertains to all of the above. <br /> <br />28. <br /> <br />29. <br /> <br /> <br />