10/06/87 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5. That a portion of the subject property is located within Safety Zone A of the proposed Gateway North Industrial Airport Zoning Ordinance. 6. That the Applicant is proposing to construct and operate a commercial asphalt bituminous plant on the subject property. 7. That a commercial asphalt bituminous plant i$ not a permitted use in the I-1 Industrial district. 8. That the proposed plant will require silos of approximately 35 feet in height. 9. That due to the proximity of the subject property to the Gateway North Industrial Airport and the height of the proposed silos, the silos may impact the airspace of the airport. 10. That the adjacent property to the west, east and north is located in the I-1 Industrial district. 11. That the adjacent property across the railroad tracks to the south is located in the B-1 Business district. 12. That the previous occupant on the subject property was a concrete pipe production plant. 13. That the proposed use will be in operation from approximately April through October of each year and the plant will run approximately 9 hours per day while in operation. 14. That the proposed use will be regulated by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Environmental Protection Agency. 15. That the proposed use will create additional truck traffic to and from the subject property by appoximately 15-17 trucks per hour when the plant is operating. 16. That access to the subject property will be from U.S. Highway 10 and County Road 116. 17. That an adjacent property owner, Mr. Ed Hamilton, has stated that he is opposed to the Applicant's request because of the increase in truck traffic on U.S. Highway 10. 18. That in a letter dated August 24, 1987, Joseph and Mary Jo Sentyrz, 6740 Highway 10 N.W., stated that they are opposed to the Applicant's request because of concern regarding health hazards posed by the proposed use and increase in truck traffic on Highway 10. 19. That on September 9, 1987 the Ramsey Airport Commission reviewed the Applcant's request and had the following comments: Will the proximity of the proposed use to the airport create a safety hazard, particularly with respect to visibility, for users of the airport? b. The subject property appears to be located within the boundaries of that area proposed for airport acquisition.