Laserfiche WebLink
Case #iO.A Discussion of Landfill End Use. <br /> <br /> Case #12.A Review Status of Complaint about Wild Animals (bears). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />Consider Adoption of Airport Zoning Ordinance for Gateway North Industrial <br /> <br />Airport <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that two previous hearings, March 11, 1987 and July 29, 1987, <br />have already been held and this is the final hearing on the Airport Zoning <br />Ordinance. He further stated that spoken and written comments have been collect- <br />ed from the previous meetings and,'after review of the tapes and transcripts, it <br />is felt that issues raised at those two meetings have been addressed. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that he would read and receive additional comments. Also, <br />a sheet of paper outside of the Council Chambers was provided for anyone wishing <br />to write their comments down. <br /> <br />Mr. Merland Otto summarized citizen comments taken since the last hearing and <br />subsequent responses by the City of Ramsey as follows: <br /> <br />Comment Ed Babcock regarding Schwartzman Property - concerned that the property <br /> south of Highway 10 has been held many years for development purposes. <br /> Implementation of airport zoning and airport oevelopment would impact <br /> hlr. Schwartzman's property through eminent domain proceedings and Zone <br /> B restrictions. <br />Response Specific guidelines will be followed as regards acquisition. Relative <br /> to the portion of property in Zone A, it has been recommended for <br /> acquisition. Eminent Domain would not be the City's first choice of <br /> purchase. Also, with regard to the potential impact on the property <br /> lying within Zone B, no development plan has been submitted to the City <br /> for consideration. It is thus difficult to determine whether, in fact, <br /> significant negative impacts are created. <br /> <br />Comment ~ary Jo Sentyrz - is in the B Zone - concerned whether she will be able <br /> to contir~e her business or sell it in the future? Also would there be <br /> a limit of ~.5 people per building. Her home is in the horizontal and <br /> approach surface ~herefore which zone is it in? Are various kinds of <br /> lighten ........ signs ~.~ to be a nrob!em. ~ letter-from tqs. >~n.vrz~= ~. is <br /> a~tached and made <br /> ~.~ of the minu~es. <br />Response Her business would be grandfathered in and she can continue to operate <br /> it as it exists or sell the building for another type of commercial use <br /> - as tong as it is not a prohibited use. All areas that are no~ in ~ne <br /> A or ~ zone but in the horizontal surface and approach lie in Zone C <br /> and therefore her house is in Zone C. Electro-magnetic systems or <br /> signs that glare will possibly be restricted. <br /> <br />Comment <br /> <br />Terry Bladholm - has parties interested in acquiring a parcel of <br />his property. He is concerned ~'~n~-~ upon adoption of the ord';nance, he <br />w'i!! not be able to develop or build on it. <br /> <br />City Council/August 25, !987 <br /> Page 4 of !6 <br /> <br /> <br />