Laserfiche WebLink
Co~cilm~ber Cox inquired if a covenants for this kind of P.U.D. would <br />conflict with the existing city ordinances. <br /> <br />Mr. Goodrich replied that ordinance will all~ the occupations in this area <br />but the hemes would require conditional use permits because they are non- <br />permitted uses on industrial property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated that this area might be desireable for such a <br />develou~-nt as it would serve as a buffer in an area where industrial and <br />residential zones meet. Co~cilmember Cox stated that he is willing to <br />seriously oonsider l~ase I of this P.U.D. <br /> <br />Mr. Go(xfrich suggested that the developer prepare performance ~rde for <br />the area that would address noise, hours of operation, types of home <br />occupations all(~ed, etc. <br /> <br />Co~cilm~mber DeLuca stated that he feels the P.U.D. is worth considering <br />because it would serve as a buffer where residential and industrial zones <br />meet. ~e would like to see language incorporated into the convenants that <br />would produce a self-policing affect. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson stated that he likes the idea of a residential <br />develolm~nt with home occupations and it should be workable if proper <br />policing methods are built into the covenants. <br /> <br />Councilmember Sorteberg stated that he likes the idea ~f an area zoned for <br />home occupations. <br /> <br />Order Feasibility Study On Municipal State Aid Project For <br /> ~or 167th Avenue N.W... <br /> <br />Motion by Councilms~ber Cox and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to <br />adopt Resolution 187-51 ordering the City Engineer to prepare a feasibility <br />study to upgrade 167th Avenue N.W. from Nowthen Blvd. N.W. to Jasloar Street <br />N.W. to FBA standards. (Please refer to resolution file for Resolution t87- <br />51). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Co~cil,~m~ers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Report From Road And Bridg_e Committee: <br /> <br />a) Public Works Property; b) One-Ton Truck; c) Light ~fuiu~mt Operator - <br /> <br />At the January 27 Council meeting, the Road and Bridge Committee was <br />directed to review the need for a (me-ton truck, a light equipment operator <br />and a public works site. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated that there was ~ discussion last year regarding <br />privatization of the public works department and that has not been foll(~ed <br />up. Councilmember Cox suggested that rather than purchasing expensive <br />equi~ment for seasonal use, the City look into purchasing used equipment or <br />contracting equila~ent and operators during those times; if the city ceases <br />purchasing additional equipment, no additional public works property will <br /> <br />Page 15 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />