Laserfiche WebLink
into yearly contracts with a successful bidder to provide services at an <br />hourly rate with materials to be pmid for by the City. <br /> <br />Councilms~ber DeLuca irquired as to the status of repairing the community <br />sign and lighting for the U.S. Flag. <br /> <br />Mr. ~artley reported that those tasks have been contracted out and will be <br />acc~ished when the materials are ava{lahle. <br /> <br />Councilms~er Cox suggested that many of the repairs could be accomplished <br />by maintenance type persons listed with tempor~ eg~l~t agencies. <br /> <br />Councilm~mber Sorteberg stated that he thinks it is possible to find a <br />general maintenanoe person with electrical and pluQ~fng skills that would <br />be willing to do the work on a part-time ~x~rly basis. <br /> <br />Councilmember De/mca suggested that inquiries be made at the AVTI for a <br />skilled maintenance person. <br /> <br />Council consensus was that Mr. Eartley should compile a list specifying all <br />necessary repairs at City ~all and place this case ~ the March 31 Council <br />agenda for further discussion. <br /> <br />~4/sGellaneous Item: Flusher/Water Truck Conversion: <br /> <br />Mr. Mevissen stated that some of his agenda cases ha~e been tabled since <br /> <br />the first of theyear due to discussions of privatization; that <br />privatization should not impact the issue ofth~ flusher/water truck <br />conversion; that bids were received s~e time ago and he is not sure they <br />are still valid; requested council action on the flusher/water truck <br />conversion. <br /> <br />Council directed Mr. Mevissen to research whether or not the bids for <br />flusher/water truck conversion are still valid and report back to Council <br />on March 31. <br /> <br />Case %17.- Storm Sewer Imp_rovem~nt. Policy_: <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley stated that the City has established storm sewer taxing <br />districts in order to deal with store sewer problems. Now there has to be <br />a policy established regarding the use of storm sewer taxing district tool <br />in developed versus undeveloped areas, In already developed areas, the <br />improvements will most likely be made and the district will be taxed. In <br />undeveloped areas, should the district be providing storm sewer for the <br />developer or just the trunk and assess for laterals. Mr. Bartley suggested <br />that council consider a policy requiring the developer to pay for his <br />portion of the laterals. Mr. Hartley asked council to keep in mind that <br />previoo~ly developed areas will be paying right away at a higher rate than <br />ra~ land and council may want to take into consideration having the city <br />pay for laterals. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated that the presently proposed storm sewer <br /> City Council/March 24, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 17 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />