My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
04/07/87
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Planning and Zoning
>
Agendas
>
1980's
>
1987
>
04/07/87
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2025 8:46:19 AM
Creation date
6/14/2004 11:09:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Planning and Zoning Commission
Document Date
04/07/1987
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
out of the area immediately. <br /> <br />Mr. Wrench - Isguired as to the policy regarding hauling on wir~ days. <br />Chairman Peterson - Replied that hauling on windy days would be addressed <br /> <br />Mr. Shapell - Stated that he didn't believe that residents in Elk River, <br />S~erburne County, w~re notified and that they would probably have concerns <br />because they would also have to look at the excavation. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson c(mm~nted that the City of Elk River had been notified of <br />the proposed project. <br /> <br />Sandy Shapell - 9325 164th Lane - Inquired whether fencing would be <br />required around the excavated areas to prevent access by children and 3- <br />wheelers. <br /> <br />Mr. Peck replied that Northfork would obviously have a liability for the <br />creation of the lake; fencing may not be reasonable, but berming may be <br />possible. The area would definitely be posted with signs. Mr. Peck also <br />co, minted that the City would require slopes not to exceed certain limits. <br /> <br />David Pavelik - 8551 156th Lane - Inquired as to the long term effect of <br />the lake and if it would impact Lake Itasca. <br /> <br />Mr. Rehbein - Replied that the manmade lake would be separate from Lake <br />Itasca o <br /> <br />Mr. Peck - Commented that there is an overall storm water drainage plan <br />that the City is in the process of adopting. If the manmade lake reaches a <br />certain level, the overflow will drain into Lake Itasca; Lake Itasca <br />overflow will drain south towards B~y. 10. <br /> <br />David Pavelik - Inquired if low lying areas to the east would be developed. <br /> <br />Mr. Peck - Replied that 35 acres has been deeded to the City as park land; <br />no other develou~ent is proposed on the east side of Lake Itasca. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Corm__ issioner Howell to <br />adjourn the public hearing. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes.' Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Deemer, <br />Shut, ay, Zimmer, ~kwell, ~endriksen and LaDue. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />The public hearing adjourned at 8:04 p.nu <br /> <br />Respectfully sut~itted, <br /> <br />Sylvia Frolik <br />Secretary <br /> <br />Anne Norris '7 <br />C~unity Dev~olmmnt Director <br /> <br />Public Hearing/March 3, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.