My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/15/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2004
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/15/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:20:32 PM
Creation date
6/16/2004 9:08:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
06/15/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.wski, P.E. <br /> <br />January 7, 1999 <br /> <br />[f Se signal is found to be justified at ~at &me, the contractor will be authorized to order <br />equipment and p;zoceed wi~ completion of tEe signal. <br /> <br />If the signal is not justified at that fi.me, t_ken the pay item for the completion of the signal <br />system will be deleted. <br /> <br />The meeting also feat-m-ed discussion about the access point on CSAH I I5 that is located <br />between the Rum River Bridge and TH 47. A1 Pint stated that he thoug~ht that there would be <br />difficult,/with t~e property owners if e~ective measures were taken to reduce cut-t.h.rougJa ma_C-tic. <br />He said that, ideally, the access pont would be a city s~reet located closer to the bridge, and <br />left-mm lanes would be added to CSASq I 16. <br /> <br />My irapression of these comments is that he thoug2:t Rat providSmg a safer facility for tee cut- <br />thzoug2x tr~:ic would be acceptable (if not desirable) to ~[u/DOT. [t also seemed teat he <br />believed teat tee cut-~rougk tra~c is a symptom of Se [ack of a r%rO_-sout5 city- smoot along <br />tee Rum P~ver and not a problem totally related to the absence ora signal at 142nd Avenue. <br /> <br />Obviously, before this issue is pursued any 52z~er, discussions with Anoka County ~r~.d t_ke <br />prope~/ow-nets must take place. <br /> <br />D P, JS/IRD/sm£ <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.