My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 06/08/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2004
>
Minutes - Council - 06/08/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:48:37 PM
Creation date
6/16/2004 9:27:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/08/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
leading towards a building permit of 140 townhomes. They made the decision not to continue <br />with the 195 unit plan because of environmental reasons. This resolved most of the issues with <br />the residential units and Highway 10. The issue of Ryland Group is that they have been on a very <br />long path and the developer has expended several hundred thousand dollars in putting together a <br />plan and working with the City since last summer. They have put the whole package together in <br />relation to the City ordinances and codes during the entire review process. Their point of view is <br />that the potential adoption of Sprinkler Chapter 1306 is allowed by the state and not a <br />requirement, it is completely discretionary as to whether the City adopts it and at what level the <br />City adopts it in relation to 16 unit buildings or 8,500 square foot structures, or at what point to <br />make the code effective. Given the long track record that Ryland Group and other builders might <br />have that have been in a long process with the City, they are complete with the process, and the <br />development agreement states that Ryland Homes and Turtle Moon will agree to build the plan <br />as the Council has approved it and to the standards applied, and the City agrees to approve it <br />according to those standards. Ryland Group has relied on all those standards, and if a standard <br />comes about in the next several weeks or months, that is very expensive with an impact of four to <br />six thousand dollars per unit. This would be that much less home that a future resident of <br />Ramsey would be able to purchase. His suggestion is that it be agreed that Ryland Group has <br />provided according to the standards the City had in place at the time and allow them to move <br />forward. If the City wanted to discuss this they should at least consider making a point of <br />application for the code. If it is adopted at final plat it would treat them together with other <br />builder developers from a business standpoint. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald suggested since there is a bit of uncomfortableness based on the fire <br />sprinkling exemption, that the final plat action be tabled tonight and taken up at the meeting of <br />the 22'~° after the Council has reviewed the sprinkling ordinance and the appropriate staff is <br />available to participate in the discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Enger stated they do not want to delay this further. They did not want to speak against the <br />sprinkling code. They will come back to speak to the Council at the time of the sprinkling code <br />ordinance and would like to go forward with the final plat tonight. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, second by Councilmember Kurak, to adopt Resolution #04-06- <br />149 approving the final plat of Rivenwick Village, and to approve the final plat contingent upon <br />compliance with City Staff Review Letter dated June 4, 2004 and the developer entering into a <br />Development Agreelnent with the City. <br /> <br />Councihnember Zimmerman stated a cost of two percent is quite minor to him. He does not <br />know why the developer would want to object, the sprinklers could be used as a sale point of <br />safety in the buildings. <br /> <br />Mr. Enger stated he does not object to the sprinkling code, but Ryland Group is beyond that point <br />and they cannot pass that cost on to the buyer at this point. The sprinklers will not increase the <br />value of the homes. If they had known about the code six months ago they would have <br />accounted for it in the dealings with the developer. <br /> <br />City Council/June 8, 2004 <br />Page 18 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.