Laserfiche WebLink
Terry and LaDue. Voting No: None. <br />Howell and Holm. <br /> <br />Absent: <br /> <br />Commissioners Hendr iksen, <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Terry snd seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to <br />adopt Findings of Fact 0185, as amended, relating to Mr. and Mrs. <br />Brettschneider's request for a variance. (Please refer to findings of fact <br />file for Findings of Fact 0185). <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />LaDue and Terry. <br />Holm and Howell. <br /> <br />Voting Yes: <br />Voting No: <br /> <br />Chairman Shumway, Commissioners Zimmerman, <br />None. Absent: Commissioners Hendriksen, <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Zimmerman to deny Mr. and Mrs. Brettschneider's <br />request for a variance until they can provide the Board of Adjustment with <br />proof of hardship. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Commissioner LaDue suggested that the case be tabled <br />to avoid the Brettschneider's having to pay another application fee to <br />reopen the case. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman withdrew his motion to deny the request. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Zimmerman and seconded by Commissioner LaDue to <br />allow time to provide for proof hardship and table any action on Mr. and <br />Mrs. Bretttschneider's request for a variance until the special Board of <br />Adjustment meeting scheduled for October 29, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Commissioner LaDue inquired as to how the placement of <br />the home on the lot was determined. Mr. Brettschneider stated that there <br />is an incline on the lot and the house was placed in the only location <br />feasible for a walkout style home. Ms. Norris noted that a larger side <br />yard setback was also required on this lot because it is a corner lot. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: <br />Voting No: Chairman Shumway. <br />and Holm. <br /> <br />Commissioners Zimmerman, LaDue and Terry. <br />Absent: Commissioners Hendriksen, Howell <br /> <br />Case ~2: Request For Variance Fro~ Section 170.05 Of The City Co~e <br /> Re~ardin~ Si~n Size: Case Of Rum River Plaza Associates; <br /> <br />Chairman Shumway noted that it has been determined that a variance is not <br />required and the case has been deleted from the agenda. <br /> <br />Case ~3: Reouest For Variance From Section 170.05 Of The City Code <br /> Re~ardin~ Si~n Size: Case Of Ramsev Carpet <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Ditschler cf Ramsey Carpet Company was present requesting a <br />variance to exceed sign size limits by 14 feet in order to install a 3' x <br />20' sign on the face of his storefront at Rum River Plaza. <br /> <br />Ms. Norris noted that the building code needs to be reviewed as it only <br />addresses signs on single commercial buildings and not shopping centers. <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/October 22, !987 <br /> <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />