Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Johnson to recommend that the City <br />Council approve the Interim Use Permit to allow outside storage as a principle use,'based on the <br />findings of fact, until July 1, 2006 and with installation ora Class V surface., ...,.::. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Jeffrey,:.Shepherd, Van <br />Scoy and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Brauer.::,': <br /> <br /> · e nd <br />Case #3: Request for Sketch Plan Review; Basalt Offie :2 AdditiOn; Case-of Ramsey <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald advised that Basalt Properties LLP woUId,like to develop on the nOrth <br />half of Lot 2, Block 1 Gateway North lndustriaI Park ~5, located' at :the corner of 141s' Avenue <br />and Ebony Street. She indicated the City currently oWnS:the pr~b~:::and in order to facilitate <br />the proposed development, the property will .need to b~:re~pIatted. She stated the proposed <br />subdivision, Basalt Office Park 2® Addition, will create tw0':I'Pts that equal 4.48 acres and '3.32 <br />acres in size from the existing 7.8 acre parcel. She indicate&the minor, subdivision will be <br />coupled with a rezoning of Lot 1, Block 1 .Basalt Office Park 2~a ,Ad&tion f~0TM E-2 Employment <br />to Planned Unit Development,,.She2'.ad;qised the PUD will allow for..~he development of two <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald indicated the two newly:'~f~{'~dlo.ts exceed the one-acre minimum lot <br />size and 200-foot lot width requirements, and Staff recomm~rrd~ sketch plan approval. <br /> <br />Commission Input <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked'if there was a reason for not separating the lot that the two warehouses <br />will be located on so they can have more imPe~doUs surface. <br /> <br />Associate .Planner Wald replied that is not.the case. <br /> <br />Motion by Con~nissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairperson Nixt to approve the sketch plan for <br />Basalt Office 2',a Addition, Subject to conditions in the City Staff Review Letter. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if the same company was going to develop both lots. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald'indicated they are, in partnership with the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if there was a reason they were not approving a PUD for both <br />lots. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald stated there is no reason to have a PUD on the second lot, because there <br />is only one building proposed. <br /> <br />Case #4 <br /> <br />Request to Rezone Proper~ from E-2 Employment District to Planned Unit <br />Development; Case of City. of Ramsey and Basalt Properties, LLP <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 3, 2004 <br /> Page 8 of 17 <br /> <br />-205- <br /> <br /> <br />