My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/21/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/21/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:25:39 AM
Creation date
8/26/2016 4:41:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/21/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission 5. 4. <br />Meeting Date: 07/21/2016 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review Sketch Plan for Brookfield 8th Addition; Case of Capstone Homes (Project No. 16-78) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to review a Sketch Plan for a twenty-seven (27) lot, single family residential <br />subdivision, proposed by Capstone Homes (the "Applicant"), on Outlot A, Brookfield 2nd Addition and PID <br />#09-32-25-44-0017 (together, the "Subject Property"). The site is generally located south of Trott Brook and west <br />of Olivine Street. The purpose of the Sketch Plan is to review the general layout of the proposed lots, streets <br />(cul-de-sac) and overall use of the property. This is the first step prior to submittal of a preliminary plat and affords <br />the Commission the opportunity to provide input on the design prior to detailed plans are developed. <br />Notification: <br />Staff attempted to notify all Property Owners within 700 feet of the Subject Property via Standard US Mail. A <br />Public Hearing and Notification is required as part of Preliminary Plat (next stage). <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Generally speaking, the proposed development appears to comply with the minimum standards of the R-1 <br />Residential District. However, the Subject Property has two (2) zoning designations, R-1 Residential (MUSA) and <br />R-1 Residential (Rural Developing). Furthermore, a portion of the Subject Property is guided as Rural Developing <br />in the Comprehensive Plan, with the remainder being guided as Low Density Residential. All but one (1) of the <br />proposed lots are proposed to be serviced with municipal water and sanitary sewer. The southern most lot would be <br />on a private well and septic system. As proposed, the project would require a Zoning Amendment and <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment to address Lots 15 and 16, Block 2. <br />The Applicant is proposing an extension of 168th Circle to access all lots with the exception of Lot 17, Block 2. <br />There are significant areas of wetlands and floodplain over the southern portion of the Subject Property. Thus, <br />rather than extending 168th Circle to the south to connect with Quartz Street, the Applicant is proposing to <br />terminate the road in a full cul-de-sac, just north of the wetland area, and plat right-of-way to connect with the <br />existing platted right-of-way of Quartz Street. The extension would result in a cul-de-sac that exceeds the maximum <br />allowable length of 600 feet and would require a variance. <br />As identified in the Staff Review Letter, there are several concerns with Lot 17, Block 2, under the current Sketch <br />Plan. First, Lot 17, Block 2 would not have frontage along a constructed public road. There is platted right-of-way <br />(Quartz Street) along the eastern boundary of this lot and the City owns an eighty (80) foot strip of land along the <br />southern boundary of the lot, neither contains a built street. Thus, the Applicant would need to construct a <br />cul-de-sac that conforms to all City standards and would provide 200 feet of frontage along Lot 17, Block 2. <br />Secondly, the Applicant is proposing to fill a portion of wetland on Lot 17, Block 2, to create buildable area for the <br />construction of a home. While that may be acceptable with the proper mitigation and approvals from the Lower <br />Rum River Watershed Management Organization, there is also Floodway within this area. Fill is not permitted <br />within areas designated as Floodway. More information would be necessary to determine whether this fill would be <br />within floodway. Additionally, the City recently adopted a new lot depth standard that requires any new lot to have <br />a depth of 100 feet with a width of sixty (60) feet that is unencumbered by wetland, floodway, or other limitations <br />that were render the land unbuildable. It does not appear that this lot would meet that standard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.