My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 08/23/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2016
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 08/23/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:24:13 PM
Creation date
8/30/2016 10:36:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
08/23/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Police Chief Katers stated that as of now this has not been challenged in other cities, noting that <br />there is Minnesota Statute which allows the authority. <br />Mayor Strommen asked how long cities have been restricting. <br />Police Chief Katers stated that it was more recent in 2015. <br />City Attorney Langel stated that this is all very new and in reaction to a legal decision. He stated <br />that there have been no legal challenges to his knowledge and believed that it would be a few <br />years before someone does challenge and brings it through the full legal process. He noted that <br />other cities in this area have adopted ordinances of this nature and at this time Ramsey would be <br />without the restriction. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau stated that he would like to have a discussion regarding whether the <br />City has the ability to restrict someone's rights when they have done their time. <br />Mayor Strommen stated that this would fall under the category of public safety, health and <br />welfare. <br />Councilmember Shryock asked for information on which portion mentioned in the staff report is <br />unconstitutional. <br />City Attorney Langel stated that prior to the ruling this was a perpetual confinement of these <br />offenders and explained that once a person has served their time they cannot be kept locked up <br />forever. He noted that this is the highest level of offender and they have the highest risk of <br />reoffending. He stated that if someone of this level were allowed into these areas of the <br />community and they were to reoffend, that would impact the community. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that because a Level III offender is most likely to reoffend, he <br />would not want that person living in his neighborhood. He stated that he would be in favor of <br />the ordinance as this would restrict locations near schools, daycares and other similar areas. He <br />noted that Andover and Anoka have already adopted ordinances of this nature. <br />City Administrator Ulrich asked what would happen if the ordinance were passed and someone <br />of this level were to move into one of these areas. <br />City Attorney Langel stated that this would be an ordinance violation and could be pursued as <br />such, noting that could also be pursued as a civil matter. <br />Councilmember Shryock asked how the City would be alerted when someone is attempting to <br />purchase a home and how that would affect the selling/buying process. <br />Police Chief Katers stated that he is not aware of an alert that would occur through the purchase <br />of a home. He stated that a Level III offender would need to register with the State when they <br />move as well as other information such as vehicle information, place of employment, places they <br />City Council Work Session / August 23, 2016 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.