Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Mayor Reimann and seconded by Councilmember Sorteberg to adopt <br />Keso]ution ~g7-248 approvJ..,~; payment of bills for the month of October, <br />198]. (Please refer to :~.,.''ut~en file for Resoluti~,n <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Ye,~-: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case f~z..,: Case ~.~c~ _ Statu~ Of Ice Rink Flooding For ]987/1988; <br /> <br />Mayor Reimgnn stated that the updated cost to retrofit the tanker truck to <br />accomodate ice rink flooding ~nd various fire department uses is $5600. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley referred to earlier concerns expressed regarding the <br />retrofitting and stated that a pressure pump is necessary because more <br />pregsure than gravity can provide is needed to spray an even ice. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember Pearson to <br />authorize retrofitting of the tanker truck by Determan Welding and Tank <br />Service zt the original bid price of $5258.00. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />Sorteberg and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />_Case f~5: Case ~11 - Solid Waste .Activities - Po]icy Review: <br /> <br />Mr. Hart!ey stated that pursuant to Council direction, he researched <br />resolutions on file by Council relating to landfill~ and solid waste <br />activity. The t~.o resolutions found do not establish a policy of <br />forbidding any business that might be involved in solid waste type of <br />activities. ~r. ~artley inquired as to Coun~i!'~ recollection of <br />discussions and intent at the time these resolutions were adopted. <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca noted that the November 6, 1985 minutes reference the <br />proposed NSP facility in Elk River; as a member of the audience that <br />evening he recalls council discussing whether or r~ot such a facility would <br />be desired in P~msey; the consensus v-as that Council was not in favor of <br />e~cc'.uraglng any landfill related bu~ ine~ ~e ~ <br /> <br /> ~ ~ '-~ ~+= th Council opposes the <br />Mr. Eartlev. stated ~.=~ the two ~esc~u~ons st=~ =--- <br />establishment of Site P as a landfill site and expansion of the existing <br />facility. <br /> <br />Co~i!memb=--~ Cox =+ated t~-+' ~ased o~ tt~ re=~uticn=, Council ca~ <br />consider abatement related businesses, <br /> <br />~e~=_*-i~-ember Cc~: referred to %7==to'_ Mar~a_~ement~ cn ~iinnes~'~a, 2nc <br /> <br />;he landf4~ .... being a =l:i ~:~,=_; .... regulating =~=n=_ ~ies have r-'ed~ that <br />deveio~ent~ cf a ~.._=~'; ~.._~ _~= ~==._~e.~=~ Counciime~ber Cox =~-~ ~o noted that <br />Waste }~nagemen= conducted a survey at the recent business expo and 9 ;~ <br />the people responding were in favor of a ski hill as am e=d use of the <br />landfill. Coumcilmember Cox stated that time is ge=ting short for <br /> City Council/October ~' ~9~7 <br /> <br />Page 6 cf $ <br /> <br /> <br />