Laserfiche WebLink
The Commission reviewed the letter from the County Engineer dated October 6~ <br />1987 regarding access for the lots. i~s 1 and 2 will acce~ c~ to 173rd <br />Avenue N.W. and Lot 3 will access on to Armstrong Boulevard N.W. Chairman <br />Zimmerman noted that the new alignment for County Road 83 lies southwest of <br />the Tranbys' plat. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Holm to recommend <br />approval of Mr. and Mrs. Tranby'9 minor subdivision, incorporating the <br />comments of the County Engineer. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners LaDue, <br />Holm, Shumway and Terry. Voting no: None. A/)sent: Commissioners Howell <br />and Hendriksen. <br /> <br />Case ~: <br /> <br />Consider Amendment to. Section 170.017 of the Citw Code <br /> Establishing Performance Standards for Grading. Mining and <br /> Excavating Operatio;~i: <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich reviewed the revision dated October 20, 1987 to the <br />proposed ordinance. The revision includes a discussion of how haul roads <br />are to be designated. <br /> <br />Mr. Art Raudio asked what prompted this ordinance. City Attorney Goodrich <br />stated that the City has recently processed many conditional use permit <br />applications for grading and mining and the Council would like to have <br />uniform standards that apply to all such operations. <br /> <br />Mr. Raudio noted that the proposed ordinance would require existing <br />operations to comply with the requirements of the ordinance within 180 days <br />cf adoption of the ordinance; this appears to be zevoking nhose existing <br />permits which he thought were perpetual. Mr. Raudio also stated that he <br />was concerned about the expense of completing all the requirements <br />specified in the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />Chairman Zimmerman asked ~'hether t.;r. Raudio believed that existing <br />operations should be grandfathered in. Mr. Raudio stated that those <br />operations that meet the City's existing standards should be allowed to <br />continue operating. <br /> <br />Chain-man Zi~erman asked M~~. Raudio to submit an}' comments he has regarding <br />~he proposed erdir~ance for the Commission's discussion prior to the nex~ <br />Co~.~.~ission meeting. Chairman Zimmerman noted that the Fub!ic hearing <br />the proposed ordinance i~ ~_cntinued tc 7:'$0 p.m., %uesday, l~ovember <br />! 987. <br /> <br />c~e <br /> <br />.C.c.n~ider Amer~d~ ~o Ch~.er !10 of the City Ced~ <br />E.~tab!i.:hin~ R~ft. letions and Zonin? Di.:trict_~ for Keer, in? Wild <br />Anir_ a ! ~.: <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich reviewed the intent cf the proposed ordinance. <br />Commissioner LaDue asked whether the State requires a minimum lot size for <br />licensing wild animals. Chairman Zinnnerman noted that his concern is with <br />tko primary and secondary enclosures. <br /> Planning & Zoning Co~is~ion/0ctober 20, !987 <br /> <br />Page2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />