Laserfiche WebLink
The ¢___~i_ ssion ~evte~ed the zoning of resideffcial p£operty lo.ted outside of <br />~ 1990 Ur~ ~ ~~ ~ ~t~ ~e ~r~ Uz~n ~rea ~da~. ~e <br />~at~ ~w r~i~ ~. Scha~r9's r~uest for clarift~tion of his <br />~r~l. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Shumway and seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to <br />recommend that Mr. Schaumberg's property and the remainder of the 40 acre <br />paroel be rezoned to R-1U. <br /> <br />FUrther discussion: The Ccmm%ission noted that minutes of the City Council's <br />discussion regarding Mr. Scha~berg's property would be helpful. <br /> <br />Ommtissioner Sh~ay withdrew his motion and commissioner Zimmerman withdrew <br />his second. <br /> <br />Motion by Cc~missioner Sh~way and seconded by Ommmissioner Zimmerman to table <br />action on this item to the February 3 meeting when additional background <br />information will be available. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Shumway, <br />Zimmerman, Deemer, Hendriksen and LaDue. Voting no: None. Absent: <br />Commissioner Howell. <br /> <br />The Commission resumed reviewing Mr. Raudio's proposal for a planned unit <br />develol~ent. (Note: At this time, C~.,.issioner LaDue left the meeting. ) The <br />Commission reviewed the City Engineer's comments and noted that the covenants <br />should be revised to show that the northern 200 feet shall be used for <br />residential purposes only, that driveways should be surfaced with blacktop or <br />concrete. The r~mainder of each paroel may be used for commercial/industrial <br />activities. The Commission reviewed the City Attorney's memo and noted that <br />the covenants need additional work with respect to screening, landscaping, <br />performance standards, signage and outside storage. <br /> <br />The Co~ssion requested that the covenants be revised and the revisions be <br />reviewed by the City Engineer and Attorney. The Commission also requested <br />information on 149th Avenue N.W. The C~ssion agreed to review Mr. Raudio's <br />proposal on February 3. <br /> <br />Case ~10: Discussion Regarding Minor Subdivision of Property East of <br /> Pondvale Estates: Case of Mr. Art Raudio <br /> <br />Mr. Raudio stated that he would like to subdivide the property south of 149th <br />Lane N.W. and east of Pondvale Estates into two parcels and one outlot. The <br />b~o lots would access on to 149th Lane N.W. The Commission suggested that the <br />lots be (~e acre each and have a ~ of 240 feet of frontage to allow for <br />future subdivision. <br /> <br />Case ~11: Discussion Regarding Storage in Industrial Area; Case of Mr. Art <br /> <br />Mr. Raudio requested clarification of what is meant by screening and <br />landscaping, particularly for industrial storage adjacent to residentially <br /> 1/20/87 - Planning and Zoning O mlssion <br /> <br />Page 4 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />