Agenda - Council - 11/22/1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I i I Case #2, _~equest For A Variance To Sul~ivide By ,Metes And Bounds~ ,Case ,0~ .Mr. ~e, ~ry Birchem, Discussion ensued regarding this rotes ,nd bounds subd/vision creating a situation Where neither parcel would have frontage on a public itreet. Motion bM Commissioner Deemer an~ seconded b2 Comnissioner LaDue that Mr. Birchem be allowed to subdivide bM metes and bounds a minimum of 2% acres, including the area of a cul-de-sac, to be determined by the City Engineer and that no further subdivision of the 40 acre parcel be allowed without platting. Further, that Mr. Birchem shall meet all requirements necessary as ~etermined by City Staff. Further Discussion: Chairman Peterson inquired if the 1 in 10 acz~ density requirement set forth by the Comprehensive Plan would apply -~n this case. Mr. Berg replied that in as much as there is only o~e subcl/vision, the ~ensity resulting is 2 in 40 acres. Mr. Berg noted that this is not final approval, that it will go to Council for final approval on November 22, 1983. Mr. Birchem stated that he intends to start construction now, that his son is getting _~married and with the economy the way it is, young couples need all the help they can get. Chairman Peterson informed Mr. Birchem that he could request a special meeting of Council in order to Obtain final approval but it cost him some money. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Deemer, Hendriksen. Voting No: None. Absent: ~.!mmerman. Commissioners LaDue, Kennen, Ommmissioners Schneider and Case #3 Preliminary Development Plan Review For N.D.H. Inc. Planned Unit .Development: Mr. Rick Foster of Oliver and Associates, was present. Mr. Foster presented copies of the sketch plan and stated that the PUD would involve a multitude of home types: a. Single family b. Quad homes c. Townhoe~s d. Duplex' s e. Oondominiums f. Some commercial Mr. Foster also noted that the sketch plan includes the proposed Thursto~ Avenue extension. He note~ that all units in the PUD will be individually owned and an effort is being made to save as many tress as possible to serve as a buffer to the multiple ~ellings. Commfssi~ner Deemer stated that he has no problem with the concept; he does have questions regarding density and noted that a piece of City property is' included in the PUD. Mr. Dick Carson, who was also present, noted that the piece of property in question was originally given to the City bM NDH. City Engineer Raatikka arrived at this time. P & Z/November 1, 1983 Page 3 of 6