My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/08/84
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agendas
>
1984
>
02/08/84
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2025 11:34:28 AM
Creation date
7/2/2004 2:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Economic Development Commission
Document Date
02/08/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br /> <br />,."}l,~'irmar; Ne'!truer: stated %hat he has talked with Hr. Dor, n reeardine the <br />,'_'o:;::,~.:.s,r ir>:. pr,2l,a?,in~, their intenl for, Cha}tep cs and ,~.[r. Lorn cor,_ri!ing it; <br />he w;il] TJot do so~ his -'ob is to criticise what the Commission-m~'¢¢~ <br />n©'t re wr, ite .-'.,~' fop <br /> <br />.i'r.,cr.?ar.e amount of detail required in first petition including <br />a~.~.c~.~.,,went r - it '~ ~ be .... ~~ ~n~t~a! <br /> _OY'P~21~-- ~,Jl~ a ~oPe SnD%'iS~4n~. ' ' ' <br />-o lhe {lounc!!. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> ! . lhcrease to 50% the initiating petition of abutting frontage. <br /> <br />C!~alr. man He.{~man stated that three concepts came out at the last Charter <br />Commission mc, eting: <br /> <br /> a. Existing residents have a hi&her priority than incoming residents. <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> b. Idea of desired dove!cements should not be inhibited. <br /> <br /> c. UndesiPeable development should be inhibited. <br /> <br />Chairman Heitman summarized the Commission's intent for Chapter 8 as follows: <br /> <br /> a. Abutting aah petition. <br /> <br /> b. Non-abutting cannot petition~ howeveP~ they do have available te <br /> them a resolution by a 4/5 Council vote._ <br /> <br /> c. Abutting must be identified and notified by City. <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />d. Non-abutting must be identified and notified by City. <br />e. Abutting can vote to stop. <br />f. Non-abutting can vote to stop. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Licther and seconded by Commissioner Sieber to recess. <br /> <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Heitman, Commissioners Gamec~ Data, <br />Bauerkemper, Lichter, Sieber and Buchanan. Voting No: None. Absent: <br />Commissioners Titterud and Greenberg. <br /> <br />The Commission recessed at g:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Chairman Heitman called the meeting back to order at 10:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Buchanan expressed concern regarding projects being 100% assessed <br />before the project takes place. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued. Commissioner Gamec explained that a development contract <br />is signed by the developer and it is binding. <br /> <br />CC/January 26, 1984 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.