My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/10/1984
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1984
>
Agenda - Council - 01/10/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 11:13:03 AM
Creation date
7/2/2004 2:27:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/10/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3. The present zoning is Urban kesidential and &11ow£ for 2-8 ~nits/mcre <br /> and Urban Business which allows for 5-15 units/acre. <br /> <br />4. Presently, this plan is not in conflict with the RAmsey Comprehensive <br /> Plan, as amended. <br /> <br />5. The proposed density of 6.6 units/acre is not in conflict with the <br /> Ramsey Comprehensive Plan, as amended. <br /> <br />6. The plan is designed to form a desirable and unified development <br /> within its own boundaries. <br /> <br />7. The proposed uses will not be detrimental to present and future land <br /> uses in the surrounding area. <br /> <br />8. Any exceptions to the standard requirements of the zoning and subdivision <br /> ordinances are justified by the design of the development. <br /> <br />The plan will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets <br />and other public facilities and utilities which serve, or are proposed <br />to serve, the planned development. <br /> <br />10. The planned development will not have an undue and adverse impact on the <br /> reasonable enjoyment of neighboring property. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />In June of 1977, public hearings were held showing proposed zoning and <br />development densities for this area. A density of 4.8 units/acre <br />was approved in 1977 and what this PUD is proposing is not that great <br />an increase. <br /> <br />12. Short term and long term screening plans, ~etween Flintwood I and <br /> Flintwood II, will be required. <br /> <br />13. A portion of open space required was donated with the platting of <br /> Flintwood I First Addition. <br /> <br />14. Mr. Peter Raatikka's letter dated November 23, 1983 to the Planning and <br /> Zoning Commission dated November 23, 1983. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />The adjoining properties to the west are residential ~wellings located <br />on approximately i acre sites with current assessing values ranging <br />from $57,000 to $80,000. - <br /> <br />It was after much discussion that-the entire Cu~mission agreed with point %7 <br />of the Findings of Fact. As a result of this discussion, Mr. Carson stated <br />that the developer would be willing to reduce the number of qua~s from 8 to 7 <br />and try to regain that density in Phase II. Mr. ~vson stated that 7 quads <br />was the absolute lowest density the developer could offer. Plans for a tot <br />lot will also be deleted. <br /> <br />It was also brought out in discussions that Council has been referring to <br />~nurston Avenue as an MSA highway and it should be MSA street. <br /> <br />Mr. Ralph Hendrikson also requested that a green buffer be planted at this <br />time for those commercial lot~ so t?.at by the time they are ~eveloped a <br />mature buffer will be in place. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.