Agenda - Council - 03/12/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _c~a~[rr.%n Peterson in~.[uired if the el,eh space re~uirer;ent brought up at the last re~.ju]ar C~3uncil meeting had been resolved. ~r. Schnelle replied that it has. ?~-~yor Gamec cor.wr~ented that if there is future subdivision to the north of this plat, park land should be included to coincide with this P.U.D. O'~air~n Peterson brought up the subject of junk cars and pets; a concern expressed at the last regular Council meeting also. ~. Dick Carson stated that the Restrictive Convenants applies to single family dwellings and the Homeo~er's Association will apply to cluster housing. Re:~ardir, g pets, the developer feels that City ordinances would cover this issue; developer does not feel he can really restrict somekody from having a pet on his property. Cor~nissioner Deemer suggested that the City Leash Law be incorporated into the Restrictive Covenants. ?~r. C~.rson agrced that the City Leash Law could be included in the Restrictive Covenants and Homeowner's D~.sociation. ~z~. C~:rson then referred to junk cars and stated that the City also has an o~'dina.nce to deal with storage of junk cars. stated that the City Ordinance limits the property o~?.er to one ~3nlicensed vehicle. }~.~. C~rson proposed that the Homeo%T~er's Association allow for no unlicensed vehic].es. ~]airman Peterson referred to'Item ~5 of the findings of fact foundon page'5 of 9 in Planning and Z~ning minutes dated February 7, 1984 and stated one councilmerJ)er feels this point needs more consideration; that this PUD will create more work for City Staff. -, ' ~ ~ Mr. Carson replied that there is a 5% a~ministrative fee being charged to the developer and that should be ~mple. Mayor Gamec stated that in looking at the total picture, the cost of providing service to this area in comparison to the tax base it will bring in is zero. City Administrator Schnelle and City .~'qgineer Raatikka stated that they foresee no excessive cost burden to the City. Cor~7, issioner Deer~er referred to the open space issue again and stated that there seems to be some misconception between open space and park land. Open space refers to green area not covered by streets and houses and has nothing to do with park land. ~ne park land dedicated in this plat was slightly deficient, but that deficiency was overlooked in consideration of certain things given to the City. ~4r. I~thur Dunn - Inquired if the s~e policy would hold true for residents forced into s~fodividing when sewer ~nd water comes to their neighborhood; would they be required to pay a park fee? P & Z~<arch 6, 1984 Page 4 of 10