Laserfiche WebLink
,! <br /> <br />available for immediate response. Each piece of equipment, as <br />well as buildings on the site, would have fire control equipment <br />and site personnel would be routinely provided instruction in <br />firefighting procedures. (June 25, 1984 Testimony of Henry Koch; <br />Plans, Sections III.B and J.) <br /> <br /> Closure and Post-Closure Care. At such time as the <br />landfill is closed, Waste Management would continue an active <br />closure and post-closure program which would include routine <br />inspections, maintenance, revegetation, if necessary, erosion <br />control, removal of leachate, and continued monitoring to assure <br />that the facility is performing as it should. (June 25, 1984 <br />Testimony of Henry Koch; Plans, Sections IX, XI and XII. County <br />of Anoka Solid Waste Ordinance 73-1, 82-1, 83-2 and 83-3, Section <br />V, subsections 5 and 6 provide comprehensive requirements for a 5 <br />year closure and a 20 year post-closure period.) <br /> <br /> 17. The North 80. Except as discussed below, the same <br />construction and operating criteria set forth with respect to <br />South 70 apply to the North 80 and the Commission draws the same <br />conclusions with respect to said items. <br /> <br />be <br /> <br />Each structure or improvement is so designed and <br />constructed that it is not unsightly, undesirable <br />or qbnoxious in appearance and will not hinder the <br />orderly and harmonious development of the City and <br />the use district wherein proposed. [170.016E <br />~ite~i~ for Approval]. <br /> <br />18. Many persons testified at the hearings to the general <br /> <br />effect that the landfill is unsightly, undesirable or obnoxious <br /> <br />in appearance. Although industrial uses to the south may be <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> <br />