Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />lot or property. <br />~ards]. <br /> <br />[170.016F <br /> <br />Performance Stan- <br /> <br /> 31. Daily cover and compaction of refuse materials would <br />reduce odors immediately caused from refuse brought to the site. <br />However, the Commission finds that, notwithstanding Waste Manage- <br />ment's odor control measures, odors and objectionable malodorous <br />gases or matter would emanate from the proposed expansion sites, <br />which would adversely affect adjacent property uses. <br /> <br />Air Pollution: No pollution of air by flyash, <br />dust, smoke, vapors or other substance shall be <br />permitted which is harmful to health, animals, <br />vegetation or other .property. [170.016F Perfor- <br /> <br />mance Standards]. <br /> <br /> 32. Air pollution associated with fly ash, dust, smoke, <br />vapors and other substances from the landfill could be reduced <br />through any one of the following methods: (i) proper development <br />of roads, (ii) watering of landfill roads, (iii) use of vege- <br />tation in completed areas of the landfill, and (iv) the use of <br />gas venting and control systems. The proposed environmental <br />improvement in the North 80 and the expansion in the South 70 <br />could utilize all of the above methods in minimizing air pol- <br />lution. <br /> <br /> Measures proposed by Waste Management to reduce air pol- <br /> lution from flyash, dust, smoke vapors and other substances would <br /> not reduce such pollution to acceptable levels. Nearby residents <br /> complained of dust from current operations. One resident testi- <br /> fied that his house, which was painted last year, is already <br /> dirty from dust generated at the landfill. Air pollution from <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br /> <br />