Laserfiche WebLink
7.02: Consider Adoption of Resolution #16-09-158 Granting Site Plan Approval for <br />Anderson Dahlen Expansion <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation from <br />the Planning Commission to approve the Site Plan for the Anderson Dahlen Expansion. <br />Motion by Councilmember LeTourneau, seconded by Councilmember Shryock, to Adopt <br />Resolution #16-09-158 Granting Site Plan Approval for Anderson Dahlen. <br />Further discussion: Councilmember LeTourneau commented that he is excited to see another <br />Ramsey business expanding their site within the City. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Strommen, Councilmembers LeTourneau, Shryock, <br />Kuzma, Riley, and Williams. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Johns. <br />7.03: Consider Adoption of Resolution #16-09-165 Authorizing Use of Eminent Domain to <br />Acquire a Drainage and Utility Easement over a Portion of 16259 Coquina St. N.W. <br />City Attorney Langel reviewed the staff report and recommendation to adopt Resolution # 16-09- <br />165 authorizing the City Attorney to commence an eminent domain action to acquire a drainage <br />and utility easement over part of 16259 Coquina Street. <br />Mayor Strommen stated that while the City does not choose to use the tool of eminent domain, <br />the tool does exist for situations of this nature. <br />Councilmember Riley noted that this is a friendly condemnation and the property owner is being <br />paid for the land being taken. <br />Motion by Councilmember Kuzma, seconded by Councilmember Williams. to Adopt Resolution <br />#16-09-165 Authorizing Action to Condemn Drainage and Utility Easement. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Strommen, Councilmembers Kuzma, Williams, <br />LeTourneau, Riley, and Shryock. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Johns. <br />7.04: Receive Update on Strategic Plan Initiative — Corridor Improvement Program and <br />Authorize Highway 10 Update Workshop <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and the feedback from the <br />EDA noting that the EDA was supportive of the initiative as proposed. He noted that much of <br />the discussion with the EDA centered on financial incentives/loans less than $25,000 to <br />encourage facade and exterior improvements above and beyond code requirements. He stated <br />that by consensus the EDA agreed to one initial workshop to scope potential alternatives, <br />inviting individual businesses to participate to refine the alternatives, and then one final <br />workshop to agree on a policy for consideration by the City Council. <br />City Council / September 13, 2016 <br />Page 5 of 14 <br />