Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Peterson replied that if Mr. Rekucki feels his rights have been <br />violated, he can address Council regarding certain eyesores or safety hazards. <br />Mr. Rekucki will not have to give up any rights. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that it would be possible to restrict the speed on the MSA <br />street to 30 m.p.h. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson referred to Item ~9 of Mr. Raatikka's letter of February 3, <br />1984 regarding 50' building setback. <br /> <br />It was noted that the PUD setbacks are from 20' to 30' <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that PUD setback requirements can be relaxed, but a minimum <br />should be set along the MSA street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer noted that most of the parcels with a 20' setback are not <br />facing the MSA street. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed sidewalks and bikeways at this time. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson stated that he has no strong reaction either way. He does feel that <br />a trailway or bikeway would get more use than a sidewalk, but it makes no <br />difference to the developer because the sidewalks would be paid for by MSA funds. <br /> <br />The concept of creating a bikeway, with allowances for parking, w-as discussed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hendriksen noted that allowing parking on this street would defeat <br />the purpose of the acceleration lane. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer stated he has no problem with allowing parking as long as <br />the homeowners understand that when the street becomes a through street, no <br />parking will be invoked. <br /> <br />Mr. Berg stated that bikeways should be segregated from roadways. He also <br />pointed out that the City would be responsible for maintenance costs on <br />sidewalks. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is not to require sidewalks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Deemer suggested that Barium St. N.W. not link into the business <br />property to the south of the PUD; there is no need to when Argon accesses <br />that business property; it is creating a possible situation of through traffic <br />to the business property. <br /> <br />Mr. Berg recommended leaving that stub of Barium to the south, that the vacant <br />property could develop as residential as well as business and then that stub <br />would be an advantage. The stub can be vacated if the property develops <br />otherwise. <br /> <br />Mr. Carson stated, from a developers view point, there would be no problem in <br />ending Barium as a bubble. <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that he received a call regarding play areas for residents <br />of the PUD and that the adjacent park has very wet soil and tot lots are <br />needed in the PUD; the homeowners association would be responsible for <br />maintenance of those tot lots. <br /> <br />P & Z/February 7, 1984 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />