Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />Council Action: Your action will be to adopt a resolution approving/disapproving <br />of said contract. The proposed resolution is contained in the above enclosure. The <br />following proposed motio~n i~s hereby submitted for your consideration: <br /> Motion by ~l.~~and seconded by ,~~ adopt Resolution ~84- <br /> approving of ~Iakanson Anderson Associates contract regarding the preparation <br /> of an airport master plan for Gateway North Industrial Airport. Please refer <br /> to resolution file for Resolution ~83- <br /> <br /> Motion carried. Voting yes ~'--~ . Voting no . <br /> <br />CASE 4~9: SETTING OF A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR ROLLING GREEN ADDITION: <br /> <br />Council action on October ZS, 1983 was to accept the feasibility study for this area. <br />Council requested this be placed on the February agenda for the purpose of scheduling <br />a public hearing date. <br /> <br />Enclosure (DZ-i) contains the proposed resolution for your adoption. <br /> <br />Council Action: Your actiOn will be to approve/disapprove of scheduling a public <br />hearing date for this street improvement project. The following proposed motion <br />is hereby submitted~ for your~co~r~deration:~/~~~~_, ~~a(~.~ <br /> Motion by ~ and'~econded by ~ to ad/opt Resolution ~84- . <br /> calling for h~ring on Improvement Project ~84-Z for Rolling Green Addition'. <br /> Said public hearing date is scheduled for March Z7, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. in the Ramsey <br /> Municipal Center. <br /> <br /> Motion carried. Voting yes . Voting no <br /> <br />CASE ~10: AMENDMENT TO THE ON-SITE SEPTIC sYSTEM ORDINANCE, CHAPTER <br /> <br />(SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS): <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />In order to attain compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, enforcement of the <br />above referenced ordinance is mandatory. However, enforcement of the ordinance <br />as written would have been vitually impossible because of the financial burden which <br />would have been placed on the City. <br /> <br />Accordingly, we are recommending this ordinance be amended to bring it into <br />compliance with the recommendations of the State as well as the mandatory <br />requirements of the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Waste Control <br />Commission. <br /> <br />The revised ordinance has been submitted to both Metro agencies and their <br />recommendations have .been incoporated into the ordinance which is attached with <br />the following items for your consideration in this matter as enclosure (DZ-j): <br /> <br />a) Revised ordinance <br />b) Metropolitan Council comments <br />c) Metropolitan Waste Control Commission comments. <br /> <br />Council Action: The following proposed motion is hereby submitted for your <br />consideration: <br /> <br /> <br />