Laserfiche WebLink
I -and- <br /> Motion by and seconded by ~,~~~to <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> 0 x ]jO . approve/disapprove <br />of the final plat of Oakridge Industrial Park contingent upon the applicant <br />complying with any and all requirements set forth by the City Engineer and <br />City Attorney. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes <br /> <br />· Voting no <br /> <br />CASE ~Z: REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO ZONING ORDINANCE DENSITY <br /> <br />REQUIREMENTS AND A VARIANCE FROM SUBDMSION ORDINANCE <br />PLATTING REQUIREMENTS; CASE OF MR. THOMAS HOLKER: <br /> <br />Mr. Thomas Holker is requesting the above described variances for a 13+ acre <br />parcel of land he wishes to subdivide into two lots. The property is located on <br />Sunfish Lake Blvd. NW just south of County Road #5. <br /> <br />Mr. Holker did request a subdivision of this property at your June meeting of <br />1983. His request was for three lots but it was the consensus of the Commission <br />that only two lots would be acceptable. <br /> <br />This property, at one time, was approved for subdivision as a part of the Highpoint <br />plat but was not included. <br /> <br />We have discussed this subdivision with the Metropolitan Council and they have <br />informed us that with findings that would include the fact that the property <br />was at one time a part of a larger proposed subdivision, we could grant a variance <br />to the density requirements. The question of platting or subdividing by metes <br />and bounds must still be decided. <br /> <br />The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this request and recommended <br />granting a variance to the density requirements of the ordinance. However, <br />they did not recommend granting a variance to the subdivision code to subdivide <br />by metes and bounds. <br /> <br />The following items are included as enclosure (D3-b) for your consideration in <br />this matter: <br /> <br /> a) Applicant's letter dated April 11, 1984 <br />b) Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes dated June 7, 1983 <br />c) Proposed findings of fact <br />d) Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes dated May 1, 1984 <br />e) Letter to Mr. Thomas Holker dated May 4, 1984 <br /> <br />Council Action: Your action will be to approve/disapprove/amend the proposed <br />findings of fact and approve/disapprove of Mr. Holker's request. The following <br />proposed motions are hereby~ submitted for your consideration: A t~ [ <br /> <br /> Motion by ~. [~ and seconded by to <br /> approve/amend/disapprove the proposed findings of fact for Mr. Thomas <br /> Holker's request. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting yes <br /> <br />· Voting no <br /> <br />-and- <br /> <br /> <br />