Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> PROPOSED <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br />FOR JOH~ C. HOGLUND <br /> <br />1) That the Applicant has properly applied for a Board of Adjustment hearing <br />to construct an accessory building larger than allowed by City Ordinance. <br /> <br />2) That the Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public <br />hearing on May 24, 1984, and that said public hearing was properly advertised <br />and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part <br />of these findings by reference. <br /> <br />3) That the Applicant's property is approximately one acre in size and is <br />generally known as 6620 - 154th Lane N.W. <br /> <br />4) That the Applicant's request is to build an addition to his present garage <br />of 14 x 36 (504 square feet) which added to his present garage area would be <br />a total of 1,296 square feet. <br /> <br />5) That City Ordinance restricts accessory buildings on parcels of land of <br />less than 2.5 acres to a maximum of 624 square feet. <br /> <br />6) That the City Ordinance, on a parcel of property of this size, would <br />allow for an attached garage of 864 square feet and a detached accessory <br />building of 624 square feet for a combined total of 1,488 square feet. <br /> <br />7) That granting the applicant's request would give him a total of 1,296 <br />square feet of accessory buildings. <br /> <br />8) That these are not exceptional, unique or extraordinary circumstances or <br />conditions applying to the property in question as to the intended use of the <br />property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoning <br />district. <br /> <br />9) ~nat such variance is necessary not for the preservation and enjoyment of <br />a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other properties in <br />the same district and in the same vicinity. The possibility of increased <br />financial return shall not in itself be deemed sufficient to warrant a <br />variance. <br /> <br />10) That the authorizing of such variance will not be of substantial detri- <br />ment to adjacent property and will not materially impair the intent and pur- <br />pose of this Ordinance or the public interest. <br /> <br />11) That the condition or situation of the specific piece of property, or <br />the intended use of said property, for which the variance is south, is not <br />of so general or recurrent a nature as to make reasonably practicable the <br />formulation of a general regulation for such conditions or situation. <br /> <br />12) That the variance observes the spirit and intent of this Ordinance, pro- <br />duces substantial justice and is not contrary to the public interest. <br /> <br />13) That properly constructed, the building would comply with the requirements <br />of the State Building Code. <br /> <br />14) That the Applicant has agreed to enter into an agreement with the City of <br />Ramsey guaranteeing conditions of his development. <br /> <br /> <br />