Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />RESPONSE C0~ENTS: <br /> <br />Go¢,8 I~ea <br /> <br />Naintain own system now on regulsr basis <br /> <br />To dig up d~stribut~on box every 2 years, ~,ou]d be a ~rob~m - <br /> no ?roblem with inspection <br /> <br />Or~dinance can help on individual case <br />Keep cost down <br /> <br />Homeowner's responsibility to know where the system is located <br /> and how it works <br /> <br />Rely on pumpers to determine if system needs to be pumped <br /> <br />Adjust the cost to those who keep system working properly on a <br /> regular basis <br /> <br />Important to maintain system <br /> <br />Homeowner show proof of maintaining to cut cost and need for city <br /> to come out every 24 months <br /> <br />Why search for a problem? <br /> <br />Individual cases dealt with on individual b~sis <br /> <br />Put the responsibility on the homeowner <br /> <br />Not neceasary <br /> <br />Public in~'orm~tion to inform on ho',~' tc mainzain <br /> <br />Flexibility w~-en comes to 75.00 cosz . <br />Favor of a maintenance program <br /> <br />There is a need for such a program <br /> <br />Money is too much <br /> <br />75.00 too expensive <br /> <br />Pumpers should have a permit to pump - records at City Hall would <br /> reflect who is pumping and who is not <br /> <br />Need to know how to locate system <br /> <br />Costs could, be lowered perhaps by the use of Community Services <br /> workers <br /> <br />The person ~hose system fails should be the most interested in <br /> seeing the repairs completed <br /> <br />Proposed mandatory inspection and the resulting bureaucracy is not <br />needed <br /> <br />Rather than the mandatory inpsection and the mandatory pumping- <br /> prefer the cost of the se,~age system <br /> <br />No need to make a big deal over sewage disposal considering size <br /> of lots and general nature of the soil <br /> <br /> <br />