Agenda - Council - 04/24/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I ! i I i I I ! I I I I I i Councilmember Sortebergintroduced the motion to adopt the following findings of fact regarding Flintwood Hills Second Addition Planned Unit Development: FINDINGS OF FACT 00 1) That the developer, NDH, Inc., has applied to the City of Ramsey for a Planned Unit Development pursuant to Section 170.014G of the City Code entitled PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Z) That pursuant to the PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCEDURE, Paragraph 1 of Section 170.014G o{ the City Code, the applicant ~ubmitted his Preliminary Development Plan with the City's zoning officer. 3) That the City's Planning and Zoning Commission, on February 7, 1984, reviewed the Preliminary Development Plan, adopted Findings of Fact relating to the same and forwarded to the City Council its written report recommending that the plan be approved. That the Planning and Zoning Commission's February 7, 1984 meeting minutes relating to the..Preliminary Development Plan are incorporated herein as if fully set forth. 4) That the City Council, on February Z8, 1984, held the requisite public hearing on the Preliminary Development Plan. That notice of said hearing was properly published and written notice given to adjacent property owners. The City Council concluded all public hearings on this subject on February 28, 1984. 5) That on February Z8, 1984, the City Council met at its regular meeting and gave Preliminary Development Plan approval to the plan as presented and received from the Planning and Zoning Commission. 6) That pursuant to the FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN PROCEDURE section of the City Code Section 170.014G, the Final Development Plan was forwarded to the City's Planning and Zoning Commission who, at its regular meeting on March 6, 1984, found that the plan was in substantial compliance with the plan it reviewed and recommended for preiiminary approval on February 7, 1984. 7) That the Planned Unit Development (PUD) is not in conflict with Ramsey's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, as it does conform with the "Land Use Goals and Policies" section of said Comprehensive Plan, and specifically, the proposed PUD does conform with the zoning and density policies as outlined in the "Land Use Goals and Policies" Section of the Comprehensive Plan. That in addition, the proposed PUD does conform with the Comprehensive Plan section relating to PUBLIC FACILITIES and the timing of the same. That the Comprehensive Plan contains within it a time schedule for the construction of municipal utilities in the City and the proposed PUD conforms to this time schedule. 8) That the plan does form a desirable and unified development within its own boundaries as it is served entirely by streets within the development and it is not dependent on other adjacent residential developments or unimproved property for street access. In addition, all of the residential lots within the proposed PUD are served by a street system which is logically laid out for convenient property access. The entire PUD, with the exception of a .8 acre commercial area, is residential and, therefore, the proposed PUD has unification of uses. 9) That the predominant proposed use in the PUD is residential with the exception of one .8 acre commercial area. The properties adjacent to the proposed PUD are either residential or unimproved but zoned residential. Thus, the proposed PUD uses will not be detrimental to present and future land.